What is at stake for Baltimore as Freddie Gray trial begins?

Jury selection begins in the trial of a Baltimore police officer charged in the death of Freddie Gray. The trial could have immediate consequences for the city.

Patrick Samansk/Reuters
Baltimore Police Officer William Porter (l.) approaches the court House in Baltimore, Md., Monday. Mr. Porter is one of six Baltimore City police officer charged in connection with the death of Freddie Gray.

The start on Monday of the trial of a Baltimore police officer charged in the death of a black man while in police custody could mark a pivotal moment for a city that has been a flashpoint in the US debate on police brutality.

Officer William Porter is the first of six officers slated for separate trials in Baltimore City Circuit Court for the death of Freddie Gray, who suffered a mysterious injury while in the back of a police vehicle. The verdict could have immediate consequences for Baltimore: An acquittal could mean protests and potentially more unrest, while a conviction could shake the city’s already distressed police department.

“Everything is at stake," Police Commissioner Kevin Davis said. “The future of the city is at stake.”

Mr. Gray died from a spinal injury, which he received while in the back of a police transport van following his arrest for possessing what the officers alleged was a switchblade. Officer Porter – who faces charges of second-degree assault, misconduct in office, manslaughter, and reckless endangerment – is accused of ignoring Gray's requests for medical aid and failing to put a seatbelt on him, despite Gray being shackled and handcuffed.

If found guilty on all counts, Porter could face more than 25 years in prison. The other officers face charges ranging from second-degree murder to misconduct.

Demonstrations, mostly peaceful, began after Gray’s death, but riots erupted on the day he was buried. Looters burned down businesses, and the unrest cost the city millions of dollars in property damage. In the wake of the violence, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake faced criticism and has since dropped her bid for re-election, while then-Police Commissioner Anthony Batts was fired.

The trials, like Gray’s death, are expected to serve as a microcosm for deeper, more systemic issues the city and the nation face, and throw into sharp relief Baltimore’s social and political troubles.

For one, the lack of an incumbent in the mayoral race has opened the door for others to step in – including former Mayor Sheila Dixon, who was forced to resign after being accused of embezzlement; and Nick Mosby, a city councilman and husband to state’s attorney Marilyn Mosby, who is leading the charge against the six officers.

Other issues – such as segregation, poverty, unemployment, and housing – have surfaced, as well.

One community activist, Duane Davis, said the trial will “make or break” Baltimore.

"If it doesn't go over well, what will Christmas be like? They'll shut things down," he said. "If we have more riots, who will feel safe? The world is watching Baltimore."

Mayor Rawlings-Blake has tried to take a less extreme view, and keep focus on the trial itself. Jury selection for Porter’s trial begins Monday.

“There's definitely a lot of pressure but it's hard to say what's at stake. I know what's important: that we have order in the city,” she said. “I'm prayerful that justice will prevail and the officers will be given a fair trial by a fair and impartial jury, and that the citizens of Baltimore and the police can respect the decision.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What is at stake for Baltimore as Freddie Gray trial begins?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today