Virginia man dies after 20 tasings by police

A newly published video shows three Virginia police officers discharged their stun guns 20 times at Linwood Lambert Jr. during about 30 minutes.

(AP Photo/Star Tribune, David Brewster
Minneapolis Sgt. Ron Bellendier shows the business end of a Taser stun gun, in 2004, in Minneapolis.

Graphic video footage released Wednesday of three Virginia police officers repeatedly tasing a man who later died in their custody has brought renewed attention to the use of stun guns in law enforcement.

The video shows the officers in South Boston, Va., repeatedly shocking Linwood Lambert Jr. multiple times while he is handcuffed, outside of a hospital where the officers had initially taken him for medical help.

The incident occurred in May 2013, but a MSNBC report that aired Wednesday was the first time the new footage has been publically released. It’s the latest example of a policing paradox that has civil rights advocates alarmed: stun guns are supposed to prevent the use of deadly force, not become another source of it.

Yet an investigation by the Associated Press in April detailed at least eight fatal stun-gun shootings of black men by police in confrontations in recent years.

These immobilizing weapons are useful, but can give officers "a really false reassurance that you have more control over a situation than you do," Eugene O'Donnell, a former New York City police officer, told the AP.

The newly released footage shows police picking up Lambert in the early morning after receiving a noise complaint from the motel he was staying in. The officers, who were not named in the lawsuit, took him to a hospital for a mental health evaluation.

When they arrived at the hospital, Lambert kicked out the window of the police cruiser and ran toward the emergency room doors. The officers chased after Lambert and shocked him repeatedly.

MSNBC reported that the three officers discharged their stun guns 20 times over about 30 minutes.

"Why are you trying to kill me, man?" Lambert says while lying on the ground.

Mr. Lambert's family filed a $25 million lawsuit in April, accusing the officers of unlawfully arresting him and using "excessive, unreasonable, and deadly force."

The family’s attorney, Joe Messa, told CNN he couldn't believe what he was seeing on the video.

"It's outrageous. It's uncalled for," he said. "It's the kind of thing that shocks your conscience, and it shocks my conscience as an attorney and should shock the conscience of the public."

Lambert told the officers in the video that he did cocaine and an autopsy report said he died of "acute cocaine intoxication." He was not armed and not accused of any crime.

Defendants, including the officers and the town, have denied the family’s allegations. No one has been charged in Lambert's death. A hearing in the case is scheduled for Thursday.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.