U of Alabama party broken up by police with stun gun: Right weapon?

Three police officers were suspended after videos showed Tuscaloosa, Ala. police using a stun gun and baton on University of Alabama students Sunday. 

Jay Reeves/AP
Three Tuscaloosa police officers were suspended with pay Monday after videos posted online showed officers using a stun gun and baton to break up a post-football game party and arrest three University of Alabama students.

Three Alabama police were placed on paid leave Monday after videos surfaced online showing the officers using a stun gun and a baton to break up a party and arrest three young people near the University of Alabama. 

The footage sparked outrage and complaints of excessive force, reigniting a debate about whether police are using stun guns more than they should.

Tuscaloosa Police Chief Steve Anderson said that he is "deeply disappointed" in how his officers responded.

The incident occurred after police were summoned shortly after 3 am on Sunday to deal with a complaint about loud music, the department said.

In the videos, a Tuscaloosa officer at the apartment's door, arguing for several minutes with occupants who refuse to exit, the Associated Press reports.

"Please let go of him. You are illegally entering," one of the young men says while an officer tries to lead another person out of the apartment.

The Tuscaloosa Police Department released a statement saying that the incident is under an internal investigation.

"A full investigation of the circumstances that are depicted in these videos will be conducted and all appropriate measures taken to ensure the integrity of the Tuscaloosa Police Department in serving the citizens of Tuscaloosa," the statement posted on the department’s Facebook page read.

The University of Alabama commented on the matter Monday afternoon in a series of tweets

The three students were charged with obstructing governmental operations. 

The use of stun guns by police is under increasing scrutiny. In August 2013, a young graffiti artist in Miami Beach, Fla., died after police jolted him with a Taser stun gun. Israel Hernandez-Llach was spray-painting an abandoned McDonald's and ran away when confronted, failing to heed officers' commands to stop, according to police accounts.

The incident sparked debate on whether the police are relying too much on stun guns.

The Christian Science Monitor reported:

At a time when police departments say offenders are becoming more violent and officer injuries are on the rise, Tasers have become an invaluable tool, allowing officers to subdue suspects without deadly force. But critics say police have become too enamored of them. , and they point to the incident in Miami Beach, Fla., as evidence that the use of electroshock weapons is too often replacing caution and common sense.

The AP reports that,

Stun guns have become an extremely common policing tool, deployed in more than 15,000 U.S. law enforcement and military agencies, according to a 2011 National Institute of Justice report. TASER International Inc. says it has sold more than 800,000 of its devices to law enforcement agencies, which have used them more than 2.3 million times in the past 20 years.

The overall record shows Tasers are "safe, effective and accountable," said Steve Tuttle, a spokesman for the Scottsdale, Arizona-based company. "But it's not a magic bullet. ... There is no magic bullet."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.