'Senior salute' earns Labrie one year in jail and lifetime on sex offender registry

A New Hampshire judge has sentenced Owen Labrie to one year in jail for sexually assaulting a younger classmate during his senior year at the St. Paul's School in Concord, N.H.

Jim Cole/AP/File
Owen Labrie listens to testimony in Merrimack County Superior Court in Concord, N.H., on Aug. 25, while on trial for raping a 15-year-old freshman as part of the 'Senior Salute' at the prestigious St. Paul's School in Concord.Mr. Labrie was cleared of rape but convicted of lesser sex offenses. He was sentenced to one year in jail on Thursday and will be required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Owen Labrie, a former student at the prestigious St. Paul’s School in New Hampshire, has been sentenced to one year in jail by a New Hampshire judge for sexually assaulting an underage classmate. Judge Larry Smukler also ordered Mr. Labrie to register as a sex offender for life.

The end of the trial came in August, after months of deliberation that brought a culture of objectification of young girls at the elite Concord preparatory school into the national spotlight. Of particular prominence in the case was the St. Paul’s tradition of the “senior salute,” in which graduating seniors would invite younger students into sexual encounters.

"This was not consensual," Jude Smukler said, according to Reuters. "You did not take the time to get to know the victim."

The victim was not present for the sentence, but gave her testimony by video. In it, she described how she continued to struggle with the memory of the assault. She was 15 and a freshman at St. Paul’s at the time Labrie assaulted her.

"I don't really know how to put one foot in front of another. I don't want to feel imprisoned the rest of my life," she said. “I want to be safe again, and I want justice."

Prosecutors in the case had argued that while the victim had accepted Labrie’s invitation for a “senior salute” before his graduation from the prep school, she never intended to have sex with him.

"It is clear from the impact of this crime that she did not," Smukler said, according to The Associated Press. He also referred to Labrie as "a very good liar."

Part of Labrie’s sentence includes a felony count for using a computer to send Facebook and email messages to the victim in an attempt to seduce her. While Labrie maintained that they did not have sex, his verbal and electronic communications to his classmates revealed a carefully-crafted trail of manipulation, with one intended final result.

In the victim’s statements during the trial, she described the humiliation and deep shame that she was made to feel following her return to St. Paul’s after the assault, saying that she had been living in "near constant fear” of retaliation from Labrie and others at the school.

Labrie’s attorney, J.W. Carney, believed that probation was a better-suited punishment for his client than prison.

During the trial, he had argued that Labrie lost a full scholarship to Harvard University and that his reputation was irreparably tarnished as a result of the case.

"Owen decided to engage in a 'senior salute.' He has tremendous remorse for doing what he did," Carney said. "Owen looked to St. Paul's to guide him and instead they misled him."

But the victim’s father, himself an alumnus of St. Paul’s, said during the trial that Labrie was very much a product of the school and its “entitled” culture.

"My little girl stood up to this entitled young man, she stood up to the entitled culture at St. Paul's, she stood up to the rape culture that exists in our society that allows boys to be boys and somehow says it is OK for men to do irreparable harm to girls," he said.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Senior salute' earns Labrie one year in jail and lifetime on sex offender registry
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today