After deadly 'cops and robbers' game, father may face prison time

A 6-year-old took a loaded revolver and shot his 3-year-old brother on Saturday. The father is due in court Friday and could face five years in prison for child endangerment. 

Chicago Police Department/Reuters
Michael Santiago is pictured in this undated booking photo provided by the Chicago Police Department. Mr. Santiago has been charged with child endangerment after his six-year-old son shot and killed his three-year-old brother while the two were playing, police say, October 18.

Dad was at work, mom at the store, and grandpa upstairs making Kool-Aid. The kids were in the kitchen, having fun playing cops and robbers.

But when the 6-year-old brother took a loaded revolver from the top of their refrigerator and fatally shot his 3-year-old brother Eian Santiago in the head on Saturday, their family wept, and the father now faces up to five years in prison.

Michael Santiago, 25, was charged with felony child endangerment. Now out on bail, he is due in court Friday for a preliminary hearing. 

Mr. Santiago had reportedly kept the gun on top of the refrigerator, presumably out of the children's reach, but loaded. Santiago told investigators that he felt he needed the gun for protection after testifying in a gang-related trial.

The tragic story adds to a controversial dialogue over the issue of firearms in homes with young children, especially in a country where there are an estimated more guns than people.

It’s a conversation that has been happening for decades. In 1999, The Christian Science Monitor’s Todd Wilkinson reported on the issue of keeping firearms out of the hands of children, and one advocate told him there needs to be more gun training to understand the dangers:

[Chris Chaffin with the National Shooting Sports Foundation] says there is a difference between trying to aggrandize guns in the eyes of a child and mentoring them about the obligation to be responsible. He's careful not to promote the idea of gun classes in school, but he argues that a public which is better educated about guns is safer.

If schools teach a wide array of nonacademic subjects, such as sex education, balancing a checkbook, and swimming, he asks, then why not prepare students for a society where guns are abundant?

More than a 15 years later, how to teach children about gun safety remains a hotly contested issue. Some doctors inquire from their patients about guns in the home, much to anti-gun control advocates’ chagrin, and Florida actually cracked down on this in 2014.

According to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, nearly a third of accidental firearm deaths may be prevented with childproof safety locks and loading indicators. A third of handguns are kept loaded, unlocked, and their location known by children.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.