Why Virginia's death row inmates have more privileges than ever before

At a time when the role of the death penalty and treatment of prisoners in American justice is facing heightened scrutiny, one state has taken steps to make time spent on death row a little bit easier.

Steve Helber/AP/File
Prison guards stand outside the entrance to the Greensville Correctional Center in Jarratt, Va., Sept. 23, 2010. Virginia officials have quietly granted the state’s death row inmates new privileges amid legal challenges from the men awaiting execution.

Death row inmates in Virginia are used to hard living. They are given three showers a week, recreation time is held in an outdoor cell for five hours a week, and glass separates the inmate from family visitors.  That is, until recently.

Virginia has recently extended the privileges granted to death row inmates. A new courtyard is being built for recreation time – equipped with basketball court and exercise equipment, a room for phone calls and television, and the ability to touch and hold family during visits.

"Those kinds of things are meaningful when so very little is granted to the inmates," Victor Glasberg, an attorney who represented several inmates challenging Virginia’s strict protocols for death row inmates, told The Associated Press.

Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring praised the extended privileges, saying the conditions on death row are “significantly more progressive.” However, Mr. Glasberg believes more can be done.

"When your comparators are horrible, it goes just so far to say that you're at the top of the heap," Glasberg said. 

Glasberg is continuing to meet with officials to seek further changes.

Many improvements for death row inmates have been prompted by the case of Alfredo Prieto, a death row inmate convicted of three murders. He was executed on Oct. 1.

Virginia’s restrictions held many death row inmates in effective solitary confinement. Mr. Prieto filed a lawsuit claiming that the isolation was cruel and unusual punishment. A federal judge agreed with Prieto and claimed Virginia cannot automatically isolate death row inmates. The ruling was later overturned in an appeals court.

Prieto lost an appeal in the US Supreme Court and was executed. Other death row inmates, however, are continuing to fight for further privileges. Another lawsuit filed by death row inmates argues a similar case to Mr. Prieto’s: indefinite isolation is a cruel and unusual punishment. It is still moving through the courts.

Most opinions on extended privileges appear to be positive. Harold McFarland, whose son was killed by death row inmate William Morva, believes Mr. Morva should face the death penalty. He also supports Morva having extended privileges in prison.

“While he’s still on the Earth, he should be treated as a human,” he told the AP.

This report includes material from The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.