Five years after deadly mine blast, coal executive to face jury

Don Blankenship is accused of skirting safety regulations and ignoring broken safety protocols.

Carolyn Kaster/AP/File
Former Massey Energy Company Chief Executive Officer Don Blankenship pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington before the Senate Health and Human Services subcommittee hearing on mine safety, May 20, 2010. Mr. Blankenship, who goes on trial Thursday, in Charleston, W. Va., faces up to three decades in prison if convicted over how he ran the Upper Big Branch Mine, which exploded in 2010, killing 29 miners.

It was the worst US mining disaster in four decades, and now, five years later, the former coal company executive charged with ignoring hundreds of safety breaches and covering up safety violations is facing trial. 

Don Blankenship heads to a West Virginia courtroom on Thursday facing three felony charges for his role in a 2010 mine explosion that left no survivors. The blast occurred 1,000 feet below ground, killing 29 people at the Upper Big Branch Mine, which lies about 40 miles south of Charleston. 

Mr. Blankenship, the former chief executive officer of Massey Energy Co. who led the company from 2000 until shortly after the disaster in 2010, could face a maximum sentence of 31 years in prison if found guilty on all counts. 

After Blankenship's lawyers complained he could not get a fair trial in Beckly, Va., Judge Irene Berger moved the trial to Charleston, where more than 100 people have been called for jury selection in its US District Court. Blankenship pleaded not guilty in 2014 and is free on a $5 million cash bond. His lawyers repeatedly sought a delay in the trial.

For families who lost loved ones in the explosion, the trial was a long time coming. Betty Harrah, whose brother Steven Harrah died in the explosion, told the Associated Press that her family had thought the trial was something "we never thought would happen."

Blankenship is accused of conspiring to falsify dust samples and violating federal securities laws by lying about Massey's safety practices. A sweeping gag order from Judge Berger was lifted in March by a federal appeals court, unsealing filings and allowing participants to discuss the case.

The explosion at Upper Big Branch caused the highest death toll since 91 miners were killed in a 1972 fire at an Idaho silver mine. If convicted, the case would set a new precedent in the US justice system for accountability in the mining industry that would reach to the very top of the corporate ladder.

“There have long been bad choices in the coal mining business, but the fall guys have always been the lower echelon employees,” says Jim Lees, a former prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer, based in Charleston, W.V., during an interview following Blankenship's 2014 indictment. “I don’t recall prosecutors ever making their way to the boardroom.”

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.