Drunk driving cop? Fatal crash in Indianapolis raises questions.

The officer struck and killed a pedestrian with his cruiser on Thursday night, and a police supervisor on the scene said his breath smelled of alcohol. Two other local officers were arrested this month after being suspected of driving under the influence. 

Michael Anthony Adams /The Indianapolis Star/AP
Investigators survey the scene where an off-duty police officer fatally struck a pedestrian with his cruiser Thursday, in Indianapolis. Police spokesman Lt. Richard Riddle said the incident happened just before midnight Thursday. The officer stopped after striking the man and got out to help, performing chest compressions, Lieutenant Riddle said. The victim was declared dead at the scene.

A police officer is suspected of driving drunk after he struck and killed a pedestrian with his cruiser late Thursday night, according to Indianapolis police.  

After striking the man just before midnight, the off-duty officer got out of his car and performed chest compressions, but was unable to resuscitate the victim, according to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department.

A police supervisor at the scene reported that he could smell alcohol on the officer's breath, according to spokesman Lt. Richard Riddle.

Prior to the accident, officers were already headed to the scene because of reports of a man, now believed to be the victim, walking down the middle of the road, according to the department spokesman. The victim’s identity has not been released.

The off-duty officer underwent blood testing at a nearby hospital, and results may be available Friday afternoon. The seven-year veteran has not been identified.

The officer’s whereabouts prior to the accident are unknown, Lieutenant Riddle said, adding that police were waiting on a search warrant for his vehicle. A member of the Marion County prosecutor's office visited the scene.

According to the police department, the officer could face administrative discipline if tests show any presence of alcohol, regardless of the legal limit, because Indianapolis officers are forbidden from drinking while operating a police car.

This incident may feel like déjà vu to some locals. In recent years, a spate of officers being convicted of driving under the influence has plagued the Indianapolis police department. According to the IndyStar:

At least two other area law enforcement officers have been arrested this month on suspicion of drunken driving.

Daniel Greenwell, a 36-year-old IMPD officer with the East District, faces two counts of operating while intoxicated after he was arrested early Sunday morning.

Andrew Ryan, the assistant police chief at Butler University, was arrested on Sept. 5 after his car collided with another. A breath test showed a blood alcohol content of 0.27, a police report said.

In 2010, former Indianapolis police officer David Bisard was found guilty of nine counts of drunken driving, reckless homicide and criminal recklessness for driving his patrol car into a group of motorcyclists while responding to a nonemergency call.

Riddle said no preferential treatment would be given to the officer.

"Obviously there were questions after [Mr.] Bisard, and we are doing everything by policy in this incident to show that no officer is above the law," he told the Associated Press.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.