Baltimore to pay Gray family $6.4 million: Will trials of cops be affected?

The city of Baltimore has agreed to pay the family of Freddie Gray, who died while in police custody, $6.4 million, pending approval from the city's board of estimates.

Evan Vucci/AP/File
Family members of Freddie Gray, sister Fredricka Gray, (l.), mother Gloria Darden (c.), and stepfather Richard Shipley listen during a news conference after a day of unrest following the funeral of Freddie Gray in Baltimore, April 27. Gray's parents reached a tentative $6.4 million settlement with the city of Baltimore. The deal, announced Tuesday, appeared to be among the largest settlements in police death cases in recent years and happened just days before a judge is set to decide whether to move a trial for six officers charged in Gray's death.

The city of Baltimore has arrived at a tentative $6.4 million settlement with the family Freddie Gray, a black man who died in April after sustaining spinal cord injuries while in police custody. The settlement still needs the approval of the city’s board of estimates, but marks the potential for closure in a case which has faced ongoing internal and external pressures. The board will meet Wednesday to make a final decision.

The settlement comes as six Baltimore police officers await trials relating to Mr. Gray's death. The charges against them range from second-degree murder to assault and misconduct. Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake was quick to clarify that the settlement does not constitute admission of any guilt on the part of those officers or the police department. 

“The proposed settlement agreement going before the board of estimates should not be interpreted as a judgment on the guilt or innocence of the officers facing trial," Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said in a news release. "This settlement is being proposed solely because it is in the best interest of the city, and avoids costly and protracted litigation that would only make it more difficult for our city to heal and potentially cost taxpayers many millions more in damages."

The proposed settlement includes a $2.8 million initial payment to be made in the current fiscal year and a $3.6 million during the following fiscal year, which begins July 1, 2016. All city finances are controlled by the board of estimates and its five members include the mayor.

The city of Baltimore has made a series of similar settlements over allegations of police brutality, but this single settlement is roughly equivalent to all payouts made since 2011, which totaled $6.3 million, according to the Baltimore Sun

Relations between the community and the embattled Baltimore Police Department have long been strained, but protests and civil unrest that followed Gray's death heightened tensions to a new level – a point that attorneys for the accused police officers suggest that their clients' trials should be moved out of the city. On Thursday, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Barry Williams will hold a hearing to determine whether the trial should be moved from Baltimore because of the uproar over Gray's death.

While the defense motion is wary about whether or not  it will be possible to find a “fair or impartial jury” in Baltimore, Dwight Pettit, a veteran Baltimore defense attorney, is optimistic that enough impartial jurors can be found that the case will not have to be moved to another county.

“I think we will find many people who can say, ‘Judge, I’m going to be fair,’ ” he told the Monitor.

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.