Why some gay couples in Kentucky are still waiting for marriage licenses

For same-sex couples trying to marry in Rowan County, Ky., overcoming the obstacle of a clerk unwilling to issue licenses is halting, even with court intervention.

Timothy D. Easley/AP
James Yates (l.) and William Smith Jr. head into the Rowan County Courthouse to obtain a marriage license in Morehead, Ky., Thursday, Aug. 13. In a decision on Aug. 12, US District Judge David L. Bunning ordered Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis to issue marriage licenses, but she has refused after filing an appeal to the ruling to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On Monday, Judge Bunning denied Ms. Davis' request to delay his ruling from last week ordering her to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples.

In a seemingly contradictory series of actions, a federal judge ruled in favor of requiring a Kentucky county clerk to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, denied the clerk’s request to delay the decision, and then delayed it himself.

For Kim Davis, the Rowan County clerk, the decision and subsequent delay have bought her time to appeal without letting her off the hook completely. For the two same-sex couples who brought the case against her, the actions have brought more waiting.

Though US District Judge David Bunning wrote that delaying the ruling would give same sex couples a “favorable legal ruling with no teeth” and would “prolong the likely violation of their constitutional rights,” he granted the delay nonetheless, acknowledging that "emotions are running high on both sides of this debate."

In opposition to the US Supreme Court decision giving the green light to same-sex marriage around the country, Ms. Davis has stopped issuing marriage licenses in her county altogether. "This is not something I decided because of this decision that came down," she said in court last month. "It was thought-out and, you know, I sought God on it."

Her religious convictions – as well as those of other opponents of same-sex marriage – have become the center of the debate on which hinges the question: Should one be forced to perform an action that is legally required but clashes with one’s religious beliefs?

Judge Bunning said issuing a marriage license does not impede Davis’s freedom to believe what she wants. "However, her religious convictions cannot excuse her from performing the duties that she took an oath to perform as Rowan County Clerk," he wrote.

Her lawyer compared forcing her to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples was tantamount to requiring a nurse to perform abortions, a noncombatant to fire on an enemy soldier, or a state official to participate in executions against their will.

Davis has been in the county clerk business for 27 years. She began working for her mother, whose position she now holds, and her son now works for her.

She has said passing the onus of issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples off to another clerk would not be a viable solution, since for her it is equivalent to acceding. "If I say that I authorize that, I'm saying I agree with it, and I can't," Davis said in court.

She said her beliefs are formed by “God's holy word," but the prosecution drew out a point that could be seen as a contradiction: Davis conceded that she does not treat divorce the way she treats same-sex marriage, though divorce is banned in many interpretations of the Bible.

Davis herself has been divorced, remarried, and divorced again, and when asked if she would issue a marriage license to a person who has been divorced she said, "That's between them and God."

As  The Christian Science Monitor’s Patrik Jonsson previously reported:

Her counsel immediately filed an appeal Thursday and told her to stand fast as the court battle plays out. The standoff could end with Davis being held in contempt of court, which carries both civil and criminal penalties.

On Thursday, James Yates, who wants to marry his partner, William Smith, left the courthouse for a second time without a marriage license.

‘I still get frustrated sometimes, but then I take a deep breath and go on,’ Mr. Yates told the Associated Press. ‘I know it's going to get resolved. It's just a matter of when.’


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.