Testimony released from Rosenberg brother in famous spy case

Ethel Rosenberg and her husband Julius were put to death in 1953 after being convicted of conspiring to steal secrets about the atomic bomb for the Soviet Union, though they maintained their innocence until the end.

|
AP/File
In this 1951 file photo, a handcuffed David Greenglass is escorted by US Deputy Marshall Eugene Fitzgerald from Federal Courthouse in New York City after being sentenced to 15 years in prison for conspiracy to spy for the Soviet Union. Greenglass, whose grand jury testimony helped send his sister and brother-in-law, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, to the electric chair in 1953, has said in interviews that prosecutors pressured him to falsify information about his sister.

The brother of Ethel Rosenberg, who was a star witness against his sister and brother-in-law in a sensational Cold War atomic spying case, minimized his dealings with his sister during an earlier appearance before a grand jury and said that they had never discussed her role "at all," according to secret court records unsealed Wednesday.

The revelation may heighten public suspicion that Ethel Rosenberg was wrongly convicted and executed in an espionage case that captivated the country at the height of the McCarthy-era frenzy about Communist allegiances.

Rosenberg and her husband Julius were put to death in 1953 after being convicted of conspiring to steal secrets about the atomic bomb for the Soviet Union, though they maintained their innocence until the end.

Historians and lawyers who reviewed the transcript said it appears to lend support to both sides of a dueling narrative — that Ethel Rosenberg was framed in an overzealous prosecution even as her husband seems to have played a central role in an intricate spy ring.

"You change a black-and-white Cold War narrative — framed or traitors — into a very nuanced, gray area," said Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University, which fought for the records.

The grand jury testimony from David Greenglass, whose damning statements at trial helped secure the convictions of the Rosenbergs, had been withheld from public view even as other crucial court records have been unsealed in the last decade. A federal judge in New York, responding to requests from a group of historians and archivists, ordered the 46-page transcript unsealed following Greenglass's death last year at age 92.

The grand jury transcript opens a window into an espionage operation involving shady operatives, code names and symbols to recognize couriers for the Russian.

Greenglass presents Julius Rosenberg as a critical figure in the spying, recounting how the two men discussed the construction and detonation of the atomic bomb and indicates that his sister was generally aware of her husband's activities.

But unlike his trial testimony, his statements to the grand jury offer no evidence of Ethel Rosenberg's involvement in the plot, suggesting Greenglass may later have perjured himself when he said she had an important role, said one of her sons, Robert Meeropol.

"David Greenglass emphatically states that his sister was not involved. He states it under oath," Meeropol said.

Historians had greatly anticipated the release of the documents — the final crucial piece of evidence to be made public — in hopes of learning more how a brother came to betray his sister with trial testimony that, decades later, he suggested had been coerced by prosecutors and was partially false.

Greenglass, who was indicted as a co-conspirator and was himself sentenced to 10 years in prison, said at trial that he had given the Rosenbergs research data that he had obtained while working as an Army machinist at the Los Alamos, New Mexico headquarters of the top-secret Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb. He said he saw his older sister transcribing the information on a portable typewriter at the Rosenbergs' New York apartment in 1945.

But the grand jury records show no mention of the typing.

Decades after the trial, Greenglass was quoted by a New York Times journalist as having admitted to lying at trial about his sister in order to protect his wife. In a May decision that ordered the records unsealed, US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein noted that Greenglass said it was likely that his wife, Ruth Greenglass, rather than Ethel Rosenberg, typed up the notes that were passed to the Soviets.

Testifying before the grand jury on August 7, 1950, he told a grand jury that he and his sister never discussed such matters. He told a prosecutor how he waffled about whether to leave the Army, but that Julius Rosenberg was adamant that he should continue with his service so he could "continue giving him information."

He was then asked whether his sister, Ethel, was similarly insistent about his Army career.

Greenglass replied, "I said before, and say it again, honestly, this is a fact: I never spoke to my sister about this at all."

In the same grand jury interview, when asked whether he and Ethel Rosenberg had ever discussed commendations or citations from the Russians, he stated: "My sister has never spoken to me about this subject."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Testimony released from Rosenberg brother in famous spy case
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0715/Testimony-released-from-Rosenberg-brother-in-famous-spy-case
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe