In arrest of cop for kicking black man, signs of shift on prosecuting police

A Delaware police officer was arrested this week after video of him kicking a suspect in 2013 went public. Video is changing how some prosecutors pursue charges against police.

|
Dover Police Department/AP
In this Aug. 24, 2013, photo made from a police dash camera video and released by the Dover Police Department, Dover Police Cpl. Thomas Webster, center, kicks Lateef Dickerson in the face as Dickerson is following orders to get on the ground during an arrest in Dover, Del. The video was released on Thursday, May 7, 2015, a week after a federal judge ruled that it was no longer considered confidential. Webster was arrested on Monday, after a grand jury indicted him for assault.

A Dover, Del., police officer who faced no criminal charges in 2013 for knocking a surrendering man unconscious with a jaw-breaking kick could face jail time, after all.

In 2013, then-attorney general Beau Biden (Vice President Joe Biden’s son) failed to get a grand jury indictment against Cpl. Tom Webster for injuring Lateef Dickerson without cause. But a judge in a civil rights lawsuit recently ruled that a video of the event could be released publicly, and current Attorney General Matt Denn brought the case again, resulting in an indictment for second-degree assault Monday.

In the aftermath of Ferguson, Mo., video evidence has played a decisive role in at least one case against a police officer accused of excessive force against black suspects. In North Charleston, S.C., police brought murder charges against the officer who shot a fleeing black man in the back and then appeared to plant evidence to suggest the man had been armed with a Taser. Officials admitted that no charges would have been brought if a bystander had not recorded the shooting.

Together with the Delaware case and the broader scrutiny of police behavior since Ferguson, the incident could point to the emergence of a nascent shift in how prosecutors view police abuse allegations caught by on-the-scene video footage. The steady stream of video, experts say, is making at least some small dent in police credibility in use-of-force cases.

“Where in the past juries have been deferential to official statements and generally discounted statements from citizens who might be a suspect, or portrayed as a suspect, these videos are now proving very transformative, because they diminish that deference that juries have for the official version of events,” says Frank Baumgartner, a political scientist at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

He does not suggest that the recent videos represent a stain on the entire profession.

“I don’t think these incidents reflect a really high percentage of police behaviors,” he says. “But where we’ve been led to believe that there’s basically zero inappropriate use of force, maybe there’s 100 per year, and all of a sudden we’re seeing them.”

With more police departments mandating body cameras for patrol officers – including Los Angeles last week – prosecutors could be facing this situation with increasing frequency going forward. Mr. Baumgartner points out that prosecutors need the public to trust the police in order to get convictions in court, so public outcry over the issue could affect their judgment.

Last week, Baltimore state prosecutor Marilyn Mosby brought a range of charges including murder and manslaughter against six police officers in the death of Freddie Gray. While video of Mr. Gray did not show the moment when he suffered a fatal neck injury, it did appear to show him in physical distress and brought attention to the case.

The Dover case suggests a willingness by a prosecutor to reopen an old case based on video evidence alone. Attorney General Denn, who took office in January, acknowledged that he had been watching the post-Ferguson police use-of-force cases closely, writing on Facebook that he has refrained from posting his opinions about “some of the more visible cases that have been in the news” because of prosecutorial rules. But he noted that “it can be frustrating not to be able to share what I know about some of these cases ….”

The Delaware video shows an officer responding to a fight possibly involving a gun. The officer pulls up to the scene, where a black man in a ball cap is standing. The man raises his hands as Corporal Webster can be seen approaching from the left side of screen, ordering him to the ground. As Mr. Dickerson in the process of complying with the order, Webster kicks him, knocking Dickerson unconscious, sending his baseball cap flying, and breaking his jaw.

Webster’s attorney, James Ligouri, has said another, as-yet unreleased cruiser dash cam video will lead to Webster’s acquittal. The attorney told the News Journal of Wilmington, Del., that Webster had to use force to arrest Dickerson. In an interview with the News-Journal, Mr. Ligouri called the indictment “suspect” because it coincided with a settlement phase in a civil lawsuit. He referred to Dickerson’s injuries at the hands of Webster as an "ancient matter."

But leaders in the black community say the video shows that the allegations long made against police are not fabrications.

“I think what is good about this moment is that the use of electronics are giving confirmation to what black young men have been saying … for decades,” the Rev. Donald Morton, a Delaware civil rights leader, tells the News Journal. “We no longer have to take their word. We see it.”

Police say Webster’s actions broke department policy, but the extent to which he was reprimanded in 2013 is not clear. Webster was reinstated with pay in January 2014 and reassigned to patrol duty. This week, he was arrested, suspended without pay, and paid a $5,000 bond to be released.

Delaware officials have called for peace as the state’s case against Webster goes forward.

“Now is the time for patience as the justice system considers all of the facts and circumstances of the fact,” Gov. Jack Markell said in a statement. “Police agencies and the communities they serve must trust one another. Situations like this can erode that trust, and we need to be committed every day to a dialogue of respect and understanding for the rights of citizens and the challenging jobs we ask our police to do every day.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In arrest of cop for kicking black man, signs of shift on prosecuting police
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0508/In-arrest-of-cop-for-kicking-black-man-signs-of-shift-on-prosecuting-police
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe