Border agent shoots and kills alleged rock-thrower. Excessive force?

Civil rights advocates have voiced concern following the killing in the San Diego mountains. The policy on deadly force says it is allowed if there is 'an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury.' 

|
AP Photo/U-T San Diego, John Gibbins
This aerial photo shows the scene of a shooting by a U.S. Border Patrol agent near San Diego on Tuesday. The incident has rekindled the debate of how much force agents should use against suspected illegal immigrants.

The fatal shooting of a man who allegedly threw rocks at a US Border Patrol agent while trying to escape capture in the San Diego mountains Tuesday has rekindled concerns over the contentious issue of how much force border agents should use when trying to apprehend suspected illegal immigrants.

According to the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, which is investigating the killing, the agent was struck and injured by the rock-throwing man and shouted warnings before firing his gun.

A 2012 government-commissioned report that included an internal review by the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), parent agency of the Border Patrol, as well as an independent review by the non-profit Police Executive Research Forum, examined the issue and made recommendations, among them curbs on deadly force in response to rock-throwing.

Following the report, however, the CBP did not place restrictions on the use of deadly force, opting instead to reaffirm the current policy.

As stated in an e-mail to the Monitor Wednesday, the policy is as follows: “CBP agents and officers may use deadly force only when the agent or officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the agent, officer, or to another person.”

In this latest incident, according to the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, the agent pursued the suspect into a ravine and up a hill, where he was hit with rocks thrown by the suspect.

“The agent repeatedly told the suspect to stop in English and Spanish as the suspect continued to throw rocks down at the agent,” according to Lt. Glenn Giannantonio of the San Diego Sheriff’s Department in a statement e-mailed to the Monitor.

The agent was able to deflect some of the rocks with his hands, he continued, but the suspect threw progressively larger rocks down at the agent, “with the largest being approximately the size of a basketball.”

One of the larger rocks struck the agent in the head. Fearing that another rock strike to the head could kill or incapacitate him, the agent fired his duty pistol at least twice at the man, striking and killing him, the Sheriff’s Department statement said.

The department’s statement also notes that the information about the confrontation is “fragmentary and has not been completely verified.”

Nonetheless, the killing has raised concerns among civil rights advocates. The larger point is “how marginalized groups are treated by those who are in power,” says Charles Gallagher, chair of the Sociology Department at La Salle University in Philadelphia, via e-mail.

From stop and frisk programs “that target black and brown New Yorkers,” to draconian immigration laws that allow police to stop anyone they simply suspect is an “illegal,” to “stand your ground” laws that allow stereotypes to be the presumption of criminality, says Professor Gallagher, “we have created an environment where civil liberties can be ignored or excessive force can be used because a particular population is defined and treated as second-class citizens.”

There should be very little reason for Border Patrol agents to rely on deadly use of force to stop immigrants trying to seek a better life for themselves and their families, says Jorge-Mario Cabrera of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA).

“What these incidents tell us is that we need to rethink border security before it turns into the Wild West,” he adds via e-mail.

This perspective does not take into account the full range of threats faced on the border, however, says Ira Mehlman, of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

“Rocks can be deadly weapons (whether they are thrown in San Diego or in the Middle East) and law enforcement officers have right to defend themselves against the use of deadly force. This right extends to Border Patrol officers, just as it would to any other law enforcement officer,” he says via e-mail.

Beyond that, “all across the Southern border, agents deal with potentially dangerous individuals,” he says, adding, “As we all know, violent criminals and criminal organizations operate along the border.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Border agent shoots and kills alleged rock-thrower. Excessive force?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0219/Border-agent-shoots-and-kills-alleged-rock-thrower.-Excessive-force
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe