Same-sex marriage: Four Wisconsin couples challenge state ban

Lawyers for the four Wisconsin couples are also asking to permanently block a 'cruel' state statute that makes it a crime to travel elsewhere for same-sex marriage.

Scott Bauer/AP
Charvonne Kemp (l.) smiles at partner Marie Carlson (r.) as they speak in support of a federal lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's ban on same sex marriage on Monday, Feb. 3, 2014, in Madison, Wis. They live in Milwaukee, have been a couple for seven years, and say they would get married if Wisconsin law allowed.

Lawyers filed suit in federal court Monday seeking to overturn Wisconsin’s ban on same-sex marriages and to block a state statute that makes it a crime to travel elsewhere for such a marriage.

The lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Madison, is the latest of several similar legal challenges across the country seeking to overturn state-level barriers to same-sex marriage.

Currently 17 states and the District of Columbia fully recognize gay marriages. Thirty states – including Wisconsin – have statutes or state constitutional amendments barring gay men and lesbians from entering into same-sex marriages.

The Wisconsin lawsuit was filed by lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Wisconsin, and the law firm Mayer Brown, on behalf of four same-sex couples living in Milwaukee, Eau Claire, and Madison.

“These families simply want the security and recognition that only marriage provides,” Larry Dupuis, legal director of ACLU of Wisconsin, said in a statement.

“They have built their lives and raised children here. It is wrong for the state to treat these loving and committed couples as second-class citizens,” he said.

The suit asks the court to strike down the Wisconsin ban as a violation of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the US Constitution.

The lawyers argue that there is a fundamental right to marry, regardless of the gender of the spouses. Lawyers are also asking the court to invalidate sex specific language in the Wisconsin statutes that assign gender roles in a marriage – such as the terms husband and wife.

In addition the suit seeks a permanent injunction to block a state statute that makes it a criminal offense for a Wisconsin resident to leave the state to obtain a marriage that would be prohibited in Wisconsin.

Not only does Wisconsin not recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages, it criminalizes any effort by a state resident to enter into such a union. Violators are subject to punishment of up to nine months in jail and a $10,000 fine.

Mr. Dupuis said Wisconsin’s marriage evasion law was “cruel” in that it forced gay couples into “a Catch-22 where they can’t even travel elsewhere to obtain federal protections without their marriage being labeled a crime.”

Among the plaintiffs in the Wisconsin suit are Roy Badger and Garth Wangemann of Milwaukee, who have been together for 37 years.

Three years ago, Mr. Wangemann underwent cancer surgery. After medical complications, he was placed into a medically-induced coma for nearly a month.

Mr. Badger was granted power of attorney and used that status during the medical emergency to direct the care and treatment of his life-long companion. Had the couple been married such special legal status would not have been necessary.

According to lawyers in the case, when Wangemann’s prognosis became increasingly uncertain, Wangemann’s father sought to overturn Badger’s legal authority and have his son taken off life support.

Badger objected, and fought the attempt to challenge his legal authority. The issue was resolved when Wangemann emerged from the coma and recovered.

“What upset me the most was that after all of our time together, our relationship was not fully recognized by my family and there was a real danger that my wish to give Roy the ability to make decisions about my care could be stripped away,” Wangemann said in a statement.

“Thankfully, our wishes held in this case,” he said. “But without the protections that come with marriage, the consequences can literally be a matter of life or death.”

Lawyers for the suing couples say laws such as the Wisconsin ban treat same-sex couples as second-class citizens whose relationships are undeserving of the respect and protection afforded to opposite-sex married couples.

“More and more Americans over the past few years accept the idea that same-sex couples and their families shouldn’t be treated differently than other families,” John Knight of the ACLU Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Project, said in a statement. “It is our hope that Wisconsin will soon join the other 17 states in granting the freedom to marry,” he said.

The case is Wolf v. Walker (14CV64).

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Same-sex marriage: Four Wisconsin couples challenge state ban
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today