What US did to terrorism suspects after 9/11 was torture, report finds

It's 'indisputable' that the US engaged in torture during its post-9/11 war on terrorism, a nonpartisan report by the Constitution Project finds. The group wants federal officials to acknowledge 'a grave error.'

The US government used torture and other illegal interrogation methods in the war on terrorism, an independent task force concluded in a report released on Tuesday.

The group called on the Obama administration and Congress to acknowledge that “the authorization and practice of torture and cruelty after September 11 was a grave error.”

The task force, an arm of the nonpartisan Constitution Project, also urged the government to beef up US laws to make clear that torture and cruel and inhuman treatment of detainees are federal crimes.

“It is indisputable that the United States engaged in the practice of torture,” the group said in a 560-page report issued after two years of research. The task force said torture occurred “in many instances and across a wide range of theaters.”

It added: “The nation’s most senior officials … bear ultimate responsibility for allowing and contributing to the spread of illegal and improper interrogation techniques used by some US personnel on detainees in several theaters.”

The US government, while acknowledging the use of harsh and coercive interrogation methods against terrorism suspects in the past, has consistently denied that the specially authorized techniques amounted to torture or illegal conduct.

The Constitution Project task force, composed of a bipartisan group of former senior government officials, rejected those denials.

“This finding, offered without reservation, is not based on any impressionistic approach to the issue,” the report says. “Instead, this conclusion is grounded in a thorough and detailed examination of what constitutes torture in many contexts.”

Task force members said they compared US interrogation techniques with known instances of torture – including cases in which the US government accused foreign regimes of torture. “The United States may not declare a nation guilty of engaging in torture and then exempt itself from being so labeled for similar if not identical conduct,” the report says.

The task force was co-chaired by James Jones, a former Democratic congressman from Oklahoma and the ambassador to Mexico under President Clinton, and Asa Hutchinson, a former Republican congressman from Arkansas and undersecretary of the Department of Homeland Security under President Bush.

“After conducting our own two-year investigation, weighing the credibility of all sources and studying the current public record, we have come to the regrettable, but unavoidable, conclusion that the United States did indeed engage in conduct that is clearly torture,” Mr. Hutchinson said.

He told reporters that his task force did not have access to classified information, but that a great deal of information about the detention and interrogation programs was available to the group.

Hutchinson called upon government officials at the White House and in Congress to make a broader range of classified documents available to help expose the full story of US treatment of terrorism suspects.

Specifically, Hutchinson urged the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to declassify and release its recent secret study of CIA interrogation operations.

Laura Pitter, a counterterrorism adviser at Human Rights Watch, praised the work of the task force.

“The finding of torture by a diverse, bipartisan task force, without subpoena power and looking solely at the public record, shows the need for an official US investigation into detainee abuse,” she said. “The indisputable evidence of torture clearly raises the question: what will the US government do about it?”

She added: “The American people deserve a full accounting of the torture conducted in their name.”

The task force report won praise from others as well.

“The United States engaged in a policy of torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment in violation of law, international treaties, and our basic values,” said Linda Gustitus, president of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture.

“Our job now is to account for those acts, make amends for them, and put in place the laws that will ensure that they never happen again,” she said in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.