Trayvon Martin case: How 5 young black men see race and justice in US

The Monitor approached, at random, five young black men in Boston, Los Angeles, Coral Gables, Fla., and Louisville, Ky., and asked them to talk about the Trayvon Martin case, race relations, hoodies, and, of course, their own life experiences. Here's what they had to say.

Gregory Rose, 28, administrator in a doctor's office, Coral Springs, Fla.

Jacqui Goddard
‘Depends where you live, but I think a lot of the time people just judge you more on ... what you’re like than on your color.’ – Gregory Rose

Gregory Rose has no doubt that race played a role in Trayvon Martin's death.

"The guy talked to the police before he shot the kid, and they told him to let him go. They said, 'Don't follow him,' " he says. "But he did, and then he acted like it was self-defense.... I don't think he'd have shot him if he was white."

Still, Mr. Rose sees progress in race relations in the US – and even some reason for hope in the reaction to Trayvon's shooting. "Years ago, if something like that happened to a black person, it wouldn't be taken as seriously as now," he says.

Rose's father is from Jamaica and his mother is from Costa Rica. Growing up in Florida, he attended a majority white school and says he often endured racist slurs.

"I'm a Christian; I don't like violence," he says, placing one hand over his heart as if by way of apology. "But one time when a kid called me the n-word I took his head and I slammed it on a desk. I know I shouldn't have. I don't think he ever told the teacher. Years later we started to get along."

Rose says he doesn't think about racism much these days, and believes he has put his school experiences behind him. He has friendships with people of all colors, doesn't feel pressured to change anything about himself to be accepted, and doesn't feel he's being judged on the basis of his color in everyday life.

But when he leaves Coral Springs for the neighboring – and whiter – town of Parkland, he notices that the police there watch and sometimes follow him. "A lot of people are nice. Some say hi when I walk by, but others I'm not so sure about," he says. "I feel like they're wondering what I'm doing there because it's more unusual to see a black face."

– Jacqui Goddard, correspondent

5 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.