Sheriff Joe Arpaio defies Obama administration, legal showdown likely

The Justice Department has broken off negotiations with Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio over allegations of racial discrimination. DOJ says Arpaio wasn't negotiating in good faith; Arpaio says the Obama administration is to trying to usurp him.

Ross D. Franklin/AP
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio listens to one of his attorneys during a news conference Tuesday in Phoenix.

The Justice Department has called off negotiations with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office over accusations of racial discrimination, a move that paves the way for a showdown in court.

The point of contention is that Sheriff Joe Arpaio refused to accept an independent monitor in his office, something the Justice Department calls “a key, non-negotiable requirement of a settlement,” that was made clear from the onset.

“We believe that you are wasting time and not negotiating in good faith,” Roy Austin, deputy assistant attorney general, states in a letter to Mr. Arpaio's attorneys. “Your tactics have required DOJ to squander valuable time and resources.”

The sheriff denies he already had agreed to the court-appointed monitor. Such a monitor, he says, would usurp his authority as part of the Obama administration's goal to take control.

“I am the constitutionally and legitimately elected sheriff, and I absolutely refuse to surrender my responsibility to the federal government,” Arpaio said Tuesday, adding that he is ready for a legal battle.

Negotiations were scheduled to begin Wednesday, nearly four months since the Justice Department released a scathing report against Arpaio. A three-year civil rights investigation concluded that his office practiced systematic discrimination against Hispanics. In his letter, Mr. Austin wrote that since the findings, his department has uncovered information about his office's “failure to reasonably investigate sex crimes.”

Arpaio, who became sheriff in 1993, calls the federal government's allegations “a political witch hunt.”

The canceled talks are just one more in a series of clashes between the self-proclaimed “America's toughest sheriff” and the Obama administration. The sheriff's efforts to crack down on illegal immigrants has landed him in trouble with the federal government, which has curtailed his powers to enforce immigration laws.

That fits a broader trend. The investigation of Arpaio and his department is one of 17 probes the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division is conducting of police and sheriff departments – the most in its 54-year history, reports The Washington Post. Other departments being investigated include those in New Orleans; Newark, N.J.; Seattle; Puerto Rico; Portland, Ore.; and East Haven, Conn.

Despite the federal pressure, Arpaio continues to defy. In March, the longtime lawman announced that members of his volunteer cold-case posse found probable cause to believe that the the president's birth certificate released last April is a computer-generated fake.

The canceled talks come as Arpaio faces increasing pressure from various groups to resign even as he runs for reelection. The findings of the civil rights investigation will be the focus of a forum in Phoenix Wednesday night titled, “Holding our Elected Officials Accountable.”

Citizens for a Better Arizona, which has demanded Arpaio's resignation, is putting on the forum that will feature elected officials and other speakers who have interacted with Arpaio during his long tenure.

“Sheriff Arpaio's decision to walk away from these negotiations demonstrates his willingness to play the role of victim, while real people are victimized each day by his unconstitutional practices and policies,” said Randy Parraz, president of Citizens for a Better Arizona, in a statement.

The group was behind the November recall of former Republican state Sen. Russell Pearce, an ally of the sheriff and well-known foe of illegal immigration.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.