Tyler Clementi and cyberbullying: how courts ruled in five other cases

The trial for the roommate of former Rutgers University Tyler Clementi will be watched by legal experts nationwide to see how the court addresses the growing issue of cyberbullying. Here is a list of court proceedings where cyberbullying or Internet privacy invasion was a key issue. 

2. State of Indiana v. A.B. (2007)

In March 2006, the state of Indiana filed a delinquency petition against a Greencastle Middle School student after the school’s principal discovered a web page on MySpace where the student posted “vulgar” criticism of the school’s anti-body-piercing policy. The student, referred to in court documents as “A.B.,” also created a publicly accessible group criticizing the principal, Shawn Gobert, and a fake account for the principal.

In June 2006, the court found that A.B.’s MySpace postings, if committed by an adult, would constitute the criminal offense of harassment. A.B. appealed, and the Court of Appeals of Indiana found that the comments were political speech protected by the Indiana Constitution and that the juvenile court had restricted her right of free expression.

In May 2008, the Indiana Supreme Court declined the appeals court’s rationale, but concluded that the state had failed to prove the statutory elements of criminal harassment. They also held that the state had not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that A.B. posted with the intent “to harass, annoy, or alarm” Mr. Gobert, and that she had “no intent of legitimate communication” because she posted on her personal MySpace page, to which Gobert did not have access.

With regard to her expletive-laden comments on the publicly accessible group page, the court held that her comments were a made as a legitimate expression of anger and criticism of Gobert and the school, rather than with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm. 

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.