After Paris attacks, Alabama and Michigan won't take Syrian refugees

The governors of Alabama and Michigan say their states won't accept any more Syrian refugees. Concern about screening for terrorists rises. 

(AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen, File)
FILE - In this Sunday, Oct. 4, 2015 file photo, a Syrian refugee child sleeps in his father's arms while waiting at a resting point to board a bus, after arriving on a dinghy from the Turkish coast to the northeastern Greek island of Lesbos. Bold ideas for helping Syrian refugees and their overburdened Middle Eastern host countries are gaining traction among international donors who were shocked into action by this year's migration of hundreds of thousands of desperate Syrians to Europe.

The terrorist attacks in Paris Friday have ignited Republican opposition to letting Syrian refugees secure asylum in the United States – with two governors speaking out against resettling Syrians in their states. 

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley both issued statements Sunday announcing that their states would be closed to any refugees out of Syria. Their decisions echo similar statements from a number of 2016 Republican presidential candidates, who over the weekend called for a ban on allowing Syrians into the country out of fear it would be hard to tell whether any of them had ties to Islamic militants.

"It's not that we don't want to, it's that we can't," Florida senator and GOP contender Marco Rubio said Sunday on ABC's "This Week.” "Because there's no way to background check someone that's coming from Syria. Who do you call and do a background check on them?"

Friday’s mass killings in Paris – which involved coordinated attacks at six venues, including a concert hall and the Stade de France – left at least 129 people dead and 352 wounded. A Syrian passport found near one of the attackers had passed through three countries known for a heavy influx of refugees and loose border controls, officials said, renewing fears that people with links to terrorists and Islamic militants could use the wave of mass migration in Europe as cover for crossing borders.

Such concerns have drawn fresh attention to the debate around admitting Syrian refugees, which has been part of broader national security discussions – despite pleas from experts that overreacting to the attacks could play into the hands of extremist groups.

“What is needed is human intelligence, intimate knowledge of Middle Eastern societies. Like the 19th-century anarchists, Islamist terrorists today want to ‘sharpen the contradictions’ within Western societies," Karim Emile Bitar, a Paris-based professor of international relations at Lebanon's Université Saint-Joseph, told The Christian Science Monitor Sunday. "Overreactions and a rise of extreme rhetoric would play in their favor. Governments should not fall into that trap.”

Senator Rubio’s remarks Sunday marked a change in his position from the fall, when he told Boston Herald radio that he would be open to taking in refugees as long as a proper vetting process was in place.

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson, a retired surgeon, said that from the Islamic State’s perspective, it would be "almost malpractice" not to do everything in its power to plant militants bent on waging jihad into the ranks of refugees.

Michigan’s Governor Snyder, who in September was in talks with the federal government regarding the resettlement of refugees, also shifted his stance Sunday with his announcement to suspend the acceptance of any Syrian refugees until the Department of Homeland Security had fully reviewed its procedures.

“Michigan is a welcoming state and we are proud of our rich history of immigration,” Snyder said in the statement. "But our first priority is protecting the safety of our residents."

But Snyder's decision was controversial. 

Maged Moughni, a Dearborn attorney and Arab-American advocate, told the Detroit Free Press: "It's doing what ISIS wants. ... He's just basically buying into what ISIS wants: Muslims against the West ... Gov. Snyder is buying into the rhetoric."

Alabama’s Governor Bentley made a similar declaration, saying, “I will not stand complicit to a policy that places the citizens of Alabama in harm's way."

All three Democratic presidential candidates – former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley – supported proper screening processes for any Syrians coming into the country. But the US should admit more than 10,000 Syrians to which President Obama has committed, the said in Saturday night’s Democratic debate.

A spokesman for Mr. Obama said Sunday that the administration is moving forward with its plan to admit 10,000 refugees into the US in 2016.

"What we need to be able to do frankly is sort out that foreign fighter flow, those who have gone into Syria and come out and want to launch attacks or those people who have connections with ISIL in Syria," Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said on Fox News Sunday. "At the same time, we have to recognize there's tragic victims of this conflict, there are women, and children, orphans of this war and I think we need to do our part, along with our allies, to provide them a safe haven."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.