Turkey suicide bombing: This time, US calls it a terrorist attack right away

A Turkish security guard was killed in the attack Friday. The State Department is still sensitive to charges that it was slow to call the attack on the US mission in Benghazi, Libya, a terrorist attack.

Reuters
Turkish police forensic experts inspect the site after an explosion at the entrance of the US Embassy in Ankara Turkey, Friday. A suicide bomber killed a Turkish security guard at the US embassy in Ankara on Friday, blowing the door off a side entrance and sending smoke and debris flying into the street.

Turkish and American officials were guarded about who was behind Friday’s attack outside the US embassy complex in Ankara that killed a Turkish security guard.

But the State Department – still sensitive to charges that it was slow to call last September’s attack on the US mission in Benghazi, Libya, a terrorist attack – lost no time in putting a label on the latest incident.

“We can confirm a terrorist blast at a check point on the perimeter of our embassy compound in Ankara, Turkey,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement issued shortly after the attack.

The blast at the embassy compound entrance, the work of a suicide bomber, injured several individuals in addition to killing the guard.

Although responsibility for the attack was still unclear Friday afternoon, speculation centered on a Turkish leftist group. Terrorism experts said possibilities range from Islamist extremists or Turkey’s Kurdish separatists to Iran and Syria.

Turkey’s Interior minister, Muammer Güler, told reporters that “preliminary information” suggested the blast was the work of the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party-Front, a leftist group that has carried out attacks on Turkish police stations in past years. Turkish police sources claimed that the bomber was a member of this group and had spent time in prison on terrorism-related charges.

This group has targeted American business interests in the past but has not been known to adopt other groups’ causes, says James Jeffrey, a former US ambassador to Turkey and Iraq who is now at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The group is listed by the United States as a terrorist organization.

But terrorism experts said other groups have carried out attacks on US interests in the past in Turkey and would have motivation for targeting the Ankara embassy.

Islamist extremists were behind the Benghazi attack and have carried out terrorist acts against Western sites in Turkey in recent years.

The US lists the Kurdish organization Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, as a terrorist organization and has aided Turkey in its battle with the group. But the PKK has not attacked US interests in its long history, experts note.

Then there are Iran and Syria. Iran, which US officials consider the world’s major state sponsor of terrorism, has been engaged for several years in a tit-for-tat covert war with the US over its advancing nuclear program. Syria is Iran’s principal client state in the Middle East, and Syria’s relations with both the US and Turkey are at a low point, with both countries supporting the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

President Obama ordered stepped-up security measures at American diplomatic missions shortly after the Benghazi attack, which claimed the lives of four Americans, including US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens. The State Department, which was accused in congressional hearings of ignoring pleas for reinforced security in Libya before the Benghazi attack, is also reviewing security measures.

It was unclear Friday if security measures had recently been strengthened in Ankara and in Turkey in general, but Mr. Jeffrey says that the embassy compound in Ankara has long been “very well fortified.”

Still, it would not come as a surprise to US officials that American installations in Turkey could be targeted, terrorism experts say.

In 2008, Al Qaeda sympathizers were blamed for an attack at the US consulate in Istanbul that killed three police officers and three attackers. In 2003, suicide bombings targeted the British consulate and two synagogues in Istanbul and left 58 people dead.

Some regional experts were quick to point out that tensions in the already-jittery region ratcheted up several notches this week after Israel bombed targets inside Syria for the first time since 2007. Israel said it was targeting arms shipments destined for Hezbollah – the pro-Iranian extremist group that experts say has developed assets inside Turkey.

Syria quickly warned it could carry out counterstrikes against Israel.

But other terrorism experts were cautious, saying it is unlikely that Friday’s attack could have been organized so soon after the Israeli airstrikes in Syria, which were carried out Wednesday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.