At UN, Mahmoud Abbas puts Israeli-Palestinian conflict center stage again

The UN session this week has largely focused on Iran's nuclear program and Syria’s civil war. But Thursday, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas reminded others of the challenges for Palestinians.

Richard Drew/AP
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the UN General Assembly in New York, Thursday, Sept. 27.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas told the United Nations Thursday he will seek an upgrade this year in Palestinians’ official international status – a move opposed by the United States and Israel as a threat to reaching a negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Mr. Abbas said he would seek “nonmember observer state status” from the UN’s General Assembly, a move that would offer the Palestinians access to additional international venues and recourse to institutions such as the International Criminal Court.

The Palestinian leader painted his initiative as intended to enhance Palestinians’ rights and long struggle for statehood. It also appeared to be an attempt to put the Palestinian issue back on the world’s agenda.

At a UN session largely captured by Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war, Abbas’s speech was a reminder to the global community that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a nagging source of instability and resentment in Arab countries and much of the Muslim world.

Abbas painted a dire picture of deteriorating conditions over the past year in Palestinian territories, going so far as to accuse Israeli officials of “ethnic cleansing” in neighborhoods of East Jerusalem where Arabs have faced eviction.

Israel’s tight control on Palestinian funding and living conditions, he warned, could lead to a collapse of Palestinian governing institutions – an outcome he said should be favored by no one already worried about instability in the region.

While Abbas’s speech received prolonged applause from the UN Assembly, it was curtly dismissed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who followed Abbas to the podium.

“I say to him [Abbas] and I say to you, we cannot solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN,” Mr. Netanyahu said. He also said that “unilateral declarations of statehood” would not lead to a resolution.

Last year, Abbas tried to achieve full statehood for Palestinians through the UN Security Council, but the bid ran into a brick wall of US opposition. Abbas’s effort infuriated President Obama, who had launched several high-profile attempts at restarting the peace process. This year, Abbas has said that, while he wants to achieve “nonmember observer state status” by the end of the year, he will wait until after the US elections to submit a formal request.

The US, agreeing with Israel, insists that only direct talks between the two parties can resolve the conflict and result in a Palestinian state.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton reaffirmed this position when she met with Abbas Wednesday evening, according to administration officials.

“We’ve made clear all along our position on this to him publicly, privately, in every way, so there are no surprises on our part,” says one senior State Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity. “We have made very clear that our goal is to resume direct talks and that the idea of going to the UN is not the road that takes us there.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.