Syria: UN Security Council inaction earns reprimand from General Assembly

The UN General Assembly is voting Thursday to demand that Syrian President Assad step down. The symbolic move will also chastise the Security Council, where Russia and China have vetoed firmer action.

|
Goran Tomasevic/REUTERS
A woman walks through rubble from a building destroyed by shelling from forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad in downtown Aleppo August 1.

Frustrated with the Security Council’s inaction on Syria, the United Nations General Assembly is set to take matters into its own hands Thursday and demand that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad step down.

The purely symbolic resolution, sponsored by Arab League countries that have pressed the more powerful Security Council to take action against President Assad, calls on the embattled Syrian leader to cede power to a transitional government. The resolution also demands that the Syrian Army stop its heavy-arms and helicopter attacks on the Syrian populace.

The question now seems to be not whether the resolution will pass, but with how many votes in favor. A General Assembly vote in February on a resolution condemning Syrian authorities’ “widespread and systematic” human rights violations garnered a commanding 137 votes. Only 12 countries voted against that resolution, but some UN officials speculate that a larger slice of the assembly’s 193 members will balk at voting for a head of state’s ouster, even as a symbolic gesture.

Thursday’s vote won’t just demand Mr. Assad’s departure, but will also express the international community’s frustration with a deadlocked Security Council.

The draft resolution, written by Saudi Arabia with the support of Egypt and Bahrain, knocks the Security Council by “deploring” its inability to act on Syria. Last month permanent members Russia and China vetoed a Syria resolution for the third time over the course of the 17-month-old crisis.

Condemnation of Russia and China’s persistent blocking of action on Syria has not been limited to the lower General Assembly but has also come from the other three permanent and veto-wielding council members, the United States, Britain, and France.

After the July 19 vote, the French ambassador to the UN, Gerard Araud, noted that 3,000 Syrians had already died in the fighting when Russia and China cast their first vetoes in October. The deaths had climbed to 6,000 by the time the same two Security Council members thwarted action in February, he said. The third double-veto came, he added, as 17,000 Syrians were reported dead.

France, which took over the rotating month-long presidency of the Security Council on Wednesday, is proposing a foreign-minister-level meeting of the council on Syria before the end of the month.

But UN officials say it is not at all clear that the intensifying violence and mounting toll in Syria have budged Russia and China from their opposition to outside intervention in Syria’s internal affairs.

The draft General Assembly resolution also “demands that the Syrian authorities refrain from using, or transferring to non-state actors, any chemical and biological weapons.”

Inclusion of that statement was apparently prompted by assertions from Syrian officials last month that the regime would not resort to its stock of weapons of mass destruction – except to repel an invasion from outside forces.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Syria: UN Security Council inaction earns reprimand from General Assembly
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2012/0802/Syria-UN-Security-Council-inaction-earns-reprimand-from-General-Assembly
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe