Amid threats to cease-fire, 'Friends of Syria' seek new ways to press Assad

At a meeting in Paris, the 'Friends of Syria' countries supporting the opposition are looking at further cuts in Syria's oil exports. But Russia says the group is undermining the cease-fire.

Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters
French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe (l. and Syrian Auditing Consultant Maria Chatti attend an international conference of a working group monitoring sanctions against the Syrian regime in Paris on April 17.

With the UN-brokered Syrian cease-fire showing signs of falling apart, the Western and Arab countries supporting Syria’s opposition are searching for ways to ratchet up the pressure on the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

Each side in the conflict is accusing the other of simply preparing for the cease-fire collapse that both seem to expect. Government forces have yet to pull all their heavy weapons out of population centers as called for in the six-point cease-fire plan, and opposition forces reportedly are using a partial lull in the fighting to amass arms.

In Paris Tuesday, the “Friends of Syria” group of countries met with the goal of further shutting off the Syrian government’s spigot of revenue.

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, who told the gathering of more than 50 countries, including the United States, that the Assad government’s financial resources have been halved by sanctions and other measures since October, called for additional coordination of measures to cut Syrian revenues further.

One target: Syria’s oil exports, which have already been reduced by nearly a third since November – accounting for about $400 million a month in lost revenue – according to petroleum industry experts.

Mr. Juppe said that a central point of Tuesday’s meeting was to “send a message” to President Assad to abide by the UN cease-fire plan he agreed to and to cooperate with UN monitors who have started to arrive in Damascus. Full implementation of the plan would result in the deployment of 250 UN “blue helmets” in Syria to monitor observance of the cease-fire.

But at least one powerful supporter of Assad, Russia, blasted the Friends of Syria for undermining the fragile plan negotiated by former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that “outside forces” like the Friends of Syria were influencing the Syrian opposition “so that it doesn’t work with the government in maintaining a cease-fire and setting up a future dialogue.”

At least two members of the Arab League, Syria’s neighbors Iraq and Lebanon, expressed their opposition to the Friends of Syria focus by pointedly opting not to attend the Paris meeting.

Others, however, place the blame for the violence that has returned – after an initial lull Thursday when the cease-fire took effect – squarely with Assad.

The US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, acknowledged Monday that the violence had ebbed “for a couple of days,” but she then pointed to a resumption of shelling of the opposition stronghold of Homs over the weekend as proof that the government was violating the plan. Moreover, she said the government’s disregard was placing a dark cloud over the future of the cease-fire, saying the violations “will call into question the

wisdom and the viability of sending in the full monitoring presence” outlined in the Annan plan.

The countries gathered in Paris Tuesday set their next meeting for Washington next month – by which time the Annan plan will have either managed somehow to hold, or will have collapsed into a full-fledged return to violence.

If the latter occurs, Syria will very likely have descended into civil war, some Middle East experts say. And that, they add, will in turn increase the pressure for countries in the Friends of Syria group, like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and even the US, to provide arms to Syria’s opposition forces. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.