Time magazine cover: Did it call Chris Christie 'fat'?

Time magazine cover: Time editor, by way of explanation, says Chris Christie is a 'big Republican' and did a 'really huge thing' in winning reelection. Really? Sure looks like a reference to fat, a near taboo for US politicians. But maybe not for Christie.

Matt Smith/The Express-Times/AP
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) signs a copy of an issue of Time magazine with his picture on the cover during a campaign stop in White Township, N.J., Nov. 3. A more recent Time Christie cover, up this week, takes a less flattering angle, with the headline,'The Elephant in the Room.'

Did Time magazine call New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, um, rotund? That’s a question rattling around media sites Friday, given that this week’s Time cover features a silhouette of the non-svelte but newly reelected Mr. Christie, and the title “The Elephant in the Room."

Time itself demurs. “He’s obviously a big Republican. But he’s also done a really huge thing here this week,” said Time Executive Editor Michael Duffy on MSNBC Thursday night.

Mr. Duffy went on to say that Christie had now established himself as a serious 2016 presidential contender and a cultural phenomenon on the level of Sarah Palin or maybe even Bill Clinton.

“He’s lifted himself beyond politics,” said Duffy.

Pshaw. Not to the phenomenon part – Christie has indeed vaulted to the front ranks of US politicians by winning big in a blue state. But as to the obese-shaming denial, that’s a crock. Any journalist who has ever been in a page one or cover story meeting would know otherwise. Editors spend huge amounts of time shuffling through photos and asking about their impact, and whether we should crop here, and if maybe this would be improved by a puppy. If you think they didn’t see the “fat” connection, you probably still believe Joe Biden dials his own phone calls.

Look, that’s perfectly legitimate. Christie talks publicly about his struggle with his weight. Generally speaking, political science shows that voters prefer attractive candidates. Think about hair – the last bald person to win a presidential election was Dwight Eisenhower. And he’d won World War II.

Also, using the “elephant in the room” phrase in connection with Christie isn’t new. We did it ourselves, two years ago, writing that if he runs his size will be the “large gray mammal with a trunk” in the etc, etc.

Lots of other media types have said way, way sharper things about Christie’s girth. David Letterman has made it a running gag. It was even the subject of a “Top Ten” list on the ways the nation would be different if Chris Christie were president. (Our favorite: “No. 9: Goodbye, White House vegetable garden.")

But Christie defuses these attacks well. He went on Letterman and stuffed a doughnut in his mouth as Dave was talking to him. Letterman cracked up and hasn’t been as hard on him since.

Voters like candidates who are comfortable with who they are. In that sense, Christie’s weight could be a plus. He’s a big guy, with a big personality, and big ambitions. His size is distinctive, like Ronald Reagan’s hair, or President Obama’s ears. There’s nobody who looks like him in US politics.

In the end, his physical presence will just become one part of the total package voters weigh. (See how hard it is to avoid double entendres?) He’s indeed the elephant in the room. What remains to be seen is if he becomes the elephant in the Oval Office.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Time magazine cover: Did it call Chris Christie 'fat'?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today