New Ron Paul ad slams Etch A Sketch 'games.' Does he have a point?

Ron Paul has a new ad that slams the political world's sudden obsession with Etch A Sketch toys, following a Romney aide's unfortunate comment about them.

Charlie Riedel/AP
Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas speaks at the University of Missouri, last week, in Columbia, Mo. Ron Paul is tired of Etch A Sketch 'games' apparently and a new political ad shows it.

Ron Paul is tired of Etch A Sketches, apparently, and he’s not going to take it anymore. The Texas libertarian has a new ad that slams the media/political world’s sudden obsession with red shakable toys.

The ad opens with the now-ubiquitous CNN clip of Eric Fehrnstrom, a Mitt Romney aide, saying of a general-election campaign, “Everything changes. It’s almost like an Etch A Sketch. You can kind of shake it up and restart it all over again.”

Then it moves through cuts of Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich holding up actual Etch A Sketches, interspersed with media Etch A Sketch mentions. “We’re talking about big things here, folks!” says Mr. Santorum, while waving the fine Ohio Art product in the air.

Then the ad turns sober. “$15 trillion in debt” flashes across the screen, followed by “12 million Americans unemployed.”

At the end, “Tired of the games?” comes up, just before, in even bigger letters, “Ron Paul.”

The overall effect is to repeat the original charge – that Mr. Romney’s positions are erasable – while simultaneously belittling the political focus on playthings and framing Representative Paul as the responsible adult in the GOP hopeful room. Clever! We’ve said it before: Paul may be losing, but he’s got the best ad people in the race.

So, is Paul right that this whole Etch A Sketch fixation is silly? Well, we’ll note that from the first, we’ve said the whole thing is overblown and is likely to have little effect on either the primaries or general election.

Some commentary has gone further, noting that political science has found little evidence that gaffes, as defined by the media, have any effect on political races at all. The whole affair should make people rethink “the ‘freak show’ aspect of the political press” rather than Romney’s candidacy, writes Brendan Nyhan in a stinging piece for Columbia Journalism Review.

That said, Paul isn’t the only Romney rival to pivot off Sketch-gate for his own political purposes. The Gingrich campaign has even launched a website, SketchyRomney.com, with a virtual Etch A Sketch that viewers can shake to see Romney's positions.

The Democratic National Committee, meanwhile, has produced several ads already with an Etch A Sketch theme. So even if the red toy meme doesn’t really change voter minds, it looks sure to provide material for idea-starved campaign professionals for days to come.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.