Claire McCaskill: 'most endangered Democrat' wins Missouri Senate race

Rep. Todd Akin's comments on rape played big at the polls among both women and men voters, helping Senator McCaskill win by nearly 15 percentage points a race she had been expected to lose.

Jeff Roberson/AP
Flanked by family members, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri declares victory over challenger Rep. Todd Akin (R) in the Missouri Senate race Nov. 6 in St. Louis.

Sen. Claire McCaskill topped everyone's list of most endangered Democrats, until her challenger's comments on "legitimate rape" suddenly made the gender gap a top issue in the campaign.

Most voters in exit polls said that they gave the comments on rape and abortion by Rep. Todd Akin (R) of Missouri "some consideration" in the voting booth – and that those who did overwhelmingly sided with Senator McCaskill. The comments angered both women and men, who were only slightly less likely than women to back the incumbent.

In the end, McCaskill won with a 15 percentage-point margin a race she had been expected to lose by at least that much.

As a freshman senator, her voting record was out of sync with a state trending increasingly Republican. McCaskill's early and public support of President Obama, who lost the state twice, her backing for the 2009 stimulus and 2010 health-care reform known as Obamacare, as well as ethical issues involving taxes and improper payments didn't help. By mid-summer, she was limping into a general election with a 40 percent job approval rating and trailing Representative Akin by double digits in the polls.

But Akin's toxic comments in an August television interview that pregnancy is rare in cases of "legitimate rape," because "the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down" went viral on the Internet and gave a new face to the campaign.

Akin apologized for his "six second mistake," but by then the damage had been done – not just to GOP hopes for taking back the Senate but also to the overall Republican brand, especially among women. Top GOP leaders, including Mitt Romney, urged Akin to get out of the race. Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona said publicly that he would not be welcome in the Senate.

Still, some social conservatives, such as former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) of Arkansas, publicly backed Akin. The deadline to take his name off the ballot came and went, as Akin insisted that conservatives were rallying to his campaign and that he could still win the race.

Exit polls by the Associated Press show that McCaskill was helped by a strong turnout from women, especially among younger women, but she also drew support from nearly half of male voters. Akin drew support among women 65 and older. Exit polls also signal a racial gap: Akin drew support from white women, while black women backed McCaskill "in a landslide." 

"This election provided a clear choice between leaders like Claire McCaskill, who want to move forward by expanding women's healthcare access and economic opportunity, and candidates like Todd 'Legitimate Rape' Akin, who was committed to redefining rape, and denying women access to reproductive health care and equal pay," said Stephanie Schnock, president of EMILY's List, which raises money for Democratic women candidates to support abortion rights, in a statement after the vote.

"It looks like Claire McCaskill (D) pulled off one of the most dramatic escapes in recent political history, thanks to Rep. Todd Akin (R)," said political analyst Stuart Rothenberg. "His comments about rape, abortion and subsequent inability to stay out of the headlines ensured his defeat."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Claire McCaskill: 'most endangered Democrat' wins Missouri Senate race
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today