Beyond Hillary Clinton: Eight Democrats who might run if she doesn’t

If Hillary Clinton runs, few other Democrats will. But if she doesn't, there's a big potential field out there. 

8. Amy Klobuchar

J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, conducts a hearing on pharmaceutical company practices in July.

The two-term senior senator from Minnesota is hardly a household name outside, well, Minnesota – but Sen. Amy Klobuchar has long been on politicos’ radar as an up-and-coming Democrat.

She solidified her spot on this list by heading to Iowa, the first nominating state, in August 2013 to speak at the Democrats’10th annual North Iowa Wing Ding fundraiser. She was the first potential Democratic 2016-er to appear in Iowa since the 2012 election.

“I think a lot of work I’m doing in the Senate obviously has national implications,” Senator Klobuchar told reporters.

Last year, Klobuchar also spoke to the Iowa delegation at the Democratic convention. And during Obama’s second inaugural, she dropped in on the Iowa ball. But she insists she’s not seriously considering a run, noting that the Wing Ding is only a two-hour drive from her house in Minnesota.

This 50-something graduate of Yale University and the University of Chicago Law School wins kudos for being both affable – “Call me Amy,” she tells people – and politically shrewd. She’s also a former prosecutor.

“Amy Klobuchar has got ‘Minnesota nice’ down to a T – she’s ready for Garrison Keillor’s ‘A Prairie Home Companion,’ ” Minnesota political analyst Larry Jacobs tells Real Clear Politics. “But don’t be fooled. This is a very ambitious, very skilled, very successful politician who has her sights set very high, and she’s been thinking about the next step for some time.”

8 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.