Skip to footer

Rick Santorum: top 5 unorthodox views

Rick Santorum must try to prevent Mitt Romney from securing a majority of delegates before the Republican convention in August, and then have a contested convention. In many cases, his positions mirror Mr. Romney’s, but here are five of Mr. Santorum’s most unorthodox views.   

2. College is for snobs

Eric Gay/AP/File
Rick Santorum campaigns in Troy, Mich., before the Michigan primary.

  • By Linda Feldmann Staff writer

Santorum raised eyebrows Feb. 25 when he called President Obama a “snob” for promoting higher education. He was speaking three days before the primary in Michigan, a state with a large working-class population.

“Not all folks are gifted in the same way,” Santorum told a crowd at an Americans for Prosperity forum in Troy, Mich. “Some people have incredible gifts with their hands.... President Obama once said he wants everybody in America to go to college. What a snob.”

Santorum’s populist rhetoric has resonated with some conservatives, but has also met with push-back from top Republicans – and Mr. Obama.

In remarks to governors a few days after Santorum’s comment, Obama said that his vision for high school graduates is broader than just traditional universities.

“I’m not only talking about four-year degrees,” Obama said. “I’m also talking about going to community college to get a degree for a manufacturing job where you have to walk through the door to handle a million-dollar piece of equipment.”

Republicans also rejected Santorum’s characterization.

“I wish he’d said it differently,” Gov. Robert McDonnell (R) of Virginia, a Romney supporter, quoted in The Washington Post. “When you look at what’s going on in other countries, China, India, the premium they put on higher education – we’ve got to do better if we still want to be the global leader we are.”

Speaking on Fox News two weeks later, Santorum said he should have called Obama’s comment “snobbish,” rather than calling the president a snob.

2 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.