The ethics of using the financial aid guardianship loophole

Quentin Winstine/The Jonesboro Sun via AP
Moving in. Volunteers help Arkansas State University students move their belongings into residence halls during "operation move-in" on Saturday, Aug. 17, 2019, in Jonesboro, Ark.

Dear Reader,

When it comes to financial aid rules, is following the letter enough, or does the spirit matter, too?
 
Many people are ready to go to bat for the ethical approach, judging by the swift reaction to stories on Monday by ProPublica Illinois and The Wall Street Journal, detailing how families in suburban Chicago transferred legal guardianship of their teens in order to declare them independent so they could receive more financial aid. 
 
On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Education said it would look into how to close such loopholes. And on Thursday, Illinois lawmakers called for a hearing with the same goal in mind.
 
The controversy has also prompted some schools, even beyond Illinois, to examine financial aid awards to students whose guardianship was transferred near the end of high school. The University of Missouri in Columbia, for instance, told The Associated Press that fewer than 10 such students were found, and if the guardianship was transferred for the sole purpose of gaining need-based aid, the aid will be withdrawn.
 
While people have been swift to see this as yet another example of wealthy “Varsity Blues” types manipulating the system to their gain, not everyone doing this is very wealthy. The consultant who suggested it to clients told The Wall Street Journal in a follow-up article that she was simply following a rule laid out in the FAFSA handbook about guardianship. Though some clients were wealthy, she said, most made between $75,000 and $125,000 a year. She saw them dipping into their retirement savings to pay for college and she wanted to save them money.
 
For the sake of students who are homeless or otherwise on their own, without the aid of a parent’s income, it’s important that aid intended for them gets to them. But beyond the outrage over the exploitation of a loophole, a bigger question remains: What more can be done to improve higher education affordability and financing so people won’t be tempted to think that ethics, familial bonds, or a secure retirement is the price they have to pay to send their children to college?
 

Stacy Teicher Khadaroo, Education writer

Please sign up for the Culture & Learning newsletters, here.
For a student discount subscription to The Monitor visit: csmonitor.com/student.

Why We Wrote This

Some parents transferred legal guardianship of their teens in order to get more financial aid. Is that loophole ethical?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.