Guilty verdicts will help NCAA prosecute unethical recruitment practices

Three men were found guilty of fraud in a federal court for making secret payments to families of top recruits. The verdict gives the NCAA greater ability to enforce its bylaws related to recruitment. 

Mark Lennihan/AP
Former sports agent Christian Dawkins arrives at a federal court in New York on Oct. 1. Mr. Dawkins was one of three men found guilty of fraud for making secret payments to families in hopes of influencing their students' choices of schools, apparel companies, and agents.

A federal jury found three men guilty of fraud charges for channeling secret payment to the families of top-tier recruits to influence their choices of schools, apparel companies, and agents.

Wednesday's verdicts place the blame firmly on the men for exposing the universities to NCAA sanctions, essentially portraying the schools as victims.

The NCAA may view the verdict differently.

In fact, the organization that oversees college athletics may now have a deeper reach when it goes after rogue programs. The decision essentially turns amateurism into federal law, possibly giving future NCAA bylaws more bite and ability to dole out punishment.

"I think anybody who breaks the rules in any aspect of our society, you'd like to see them held accountable," Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said. "If the jury found them guilty of breaking rules, then they should be held accountable. But yeah, that's why we have a jury system and that's good. It's always good when, if someone does something wrong, they're found out, and they're held accountable for it."

Former Adidas executive James Gatto, business manager Christian Dawkins, and amateur league director Merl Code were convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud for funneling money and recruits to Louisville and Kansas.

All three will be sentenced on March 5, but the corruption case doesn't end there. Former NBA star and Auburn assistant Chuck Person will stand trial in February. Former assistant coaches Emmanuel Richardson of Arizona, Tony Bland of Southern Cal, and Lamont Evans of Oklahoma State go to trial in April.

All are accused of funneling apparel company money to recruits and their families.

They could be facing a difficult defense with Wednesday's verdict now that a precedent of fraud has been set. So could the schools.

The first trial revealed text messages and recorded conversations between coaches and the fixers, though nothing to definitively connect them to paying recruits.

The prosecution argued the schools, which receive federal funds, were not aware of the secret payments, including $100,000 promised to top recruit Brian Bowen Jr.

When put on the stand and facing long prison sentences, the four assistant coaches may tell a different story. At minimum, they will certainly pull back the curtain even further on what had been college basketball's worst-kept secret.

"I hope that the truth prevails and I mean that with all sincerity," Virginia coach Tony Bennett said. "There's so much stuff being floated out there, I hope what's true will be found out if there's stuff going and in the long run it will make a difference and help the game."

The game has already been blemished, first with the arrests of 10 people in September 2017 through the three-week trial that concluded on Wednesday.

More than two dozen schools have been ensnared since the arrests a year ago, for everything from paying for meals to six-figure payments to recruits' families.

Duke, Oregon, North Carolina State, Creighton, and Texas were among the schools mentioned in testimony during the trial. More schools and coaches could be caught up when the next two trials take place, each day of testimony becoming another round of the "who's next" that played out in New York over the past three weeks.

The NCAA has already adopted a reform package to curb some of the seedy recruiting practices and could be headed toward more reforms now that a legal precedent of federal fraud has been set.

"There's been many things throughout my 30 years, however many it has been, when things came out [we thought] 'this will be awful for college athletics' and 10 years later that wasn't as awful at all," Kansas coach Bill Self said. "We may be better off for it."

As the trials move forward and more information comes out, the depth of the pay-to-play corruption could become clearer. More schools could be involved or, as some coaches have said, the shady recruiting practices could be limited to a few bad seeds at the top.

"I think it's easy to paint all of college basketball with a dark brush and that's not fair; there's lot of great kids and great coaches and terrific schools involved in it," Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowslby said. "Are there bad operators out there? Yeah, there are bad operators out there. Some of them are inside schools, some of them are outside schools, but they're not the vast majority. And, at this point, I don't know who it is and who it isn't because the NCAA has not run its process yet."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP Sports Writers Dave Skretta in Kansas City, Aaron Beard and Pete Iacobelli in Charlotte contributed to this story.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Guilty verdicts will help NCAA prosecute unethical recruitment practices
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today