US students gain a bit on math, science scores but still lag Asia

US 8th-graders posted their highest math scores ever in 2015, but did not improve relative to students from other higher-scoring nations.

Alfredo Sosa/The Christian Science Monitor/Staff/File
Manny Aponte works on some math problems in his 6th grade class at Gilbert Stuart Middle School on June 2, 2016 in Providence Rhode Island. (Photo by Alfredo Sosa / The Christian Science Monitor

American students are making gains on science and mathematics standardized test scores, although not nearly enough to keep up with United States’ greatest competitors worldwide.

The Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) is given to fourth and eighth grade students every four years, and is designed to reflect student learning from official curriculums, thereby testing school-based learning. Yet while scores have risen, the United States still trails many of the same countries it did when the test was first administered.

Nevertheless, US educators are positive about the TIMSS results, and the future achievement of American students on international tests like this one.

“Certainly we have much more work to do and achievement is not as high as we would like to have it,” said president of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Matthew Larson. “But the trajectory is positive, and it may indicate that some of the efforts we’ve made over the past two and a half decades are making a difference.”

Of the approximately 600,000 students who took the test worldwide, the 10,000 American fourth graders who took the test ranked eleventh in math, while the more than 10,200 American eighth graders who took the test ranked ninth.

In both age groups, Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea all continue to lead the United States, alongside surprising top-scorers in Ireland and portions of Belgium and Canada.

Yet while eighth graders in the United States hit their highest scores yet, averaging scores of 539 on a 1,000 point scale, other countries also leaped forwards, and did so faster.

In Singapore, for example, approximately 50 percent of students tested hit the scoring benchmark for “advanced” rankings, while only 14 percent of American students did.

It is also encouraging, educators say, that gender gaps in score achievement seem to be vanishing at the fourth and eighth grade levels in the United States, although another test, the TIMSS advanced test for high achieving high school seniors, saw significant gender gaps.

Some educators say, however, that it is difficult to compare countries due to the different educational circumstances that many students within countries and within specific regions experience.

“None of these scores are corrected for socioeconomic status, which you can’t attribute to schooling,” said Stanford University professor Martin Carnoy. “So, you can’t say the score difference between any country and the next country is necessarily the result of a poor or better education.”

Nevertheless, many teachers say they are encouraged by the report, despite the United States’ failure to rise in the international rankings.

“This good news portends even stronger growth if public schools are given the chance to do what the new federal education law envisions, including more local control, less testing, continued investment in our public schools, and giving teachers more support and professional latitude to do what’s best for students,” said the president of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to US students gain a bit on math, science scores but still lag Asia
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today