US school students of color: We want teachers who look like us

As the racial gap between America's majority-white teacher cohort and majority-minority student population grabs headlines, a study shows why students want more teachers of color.

Jake May/The Flint Journal-MLive.com/AP
Kindergarten teacher Michele Stinson asks how many students have been in a school setting before at Freeman Elementary, Monday, Aug. 15, 2016, in Flint, Mich.

American school kids prefer teachers of color, a new study shows.

As the demographic make-up of US students has tipped toward a minority-majority, much has been made of the contrast seen in the nation's predominantly white body of teachers. For the first time, educators now have a glimpse of what that racial imbalance might mean to middle and high school students, thanks to new analysis conducted by researchers at New York University. 

Using survey data compiled by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the researchers canvassed the thoughts of more than 50,000 students about 1,680 teachers. 

The survey data included students' rankings of their teachers based on "7Cs" – Challenge, Classroom Management, Care, Confer, Captivate, Clarify, and Consolidate. Importantly, the researchers note, students were asked to give feedback on specific teachers, not the overall teacher workforce at their school. This meant researchers could control for other reasons students may prefer certain teachers.

Among key findings, the research suggests that students feel they relate to teachers of color better than their white counterparts, and that, in turn, this may create an environment more conducive to learning.

"This study provides empirical evidence that at least from the student perspective, there is something really different going on," study author Hua-Yu Sebastian Cherng, an assistant professor of international education at NYU, told the New York Daily News.

Currently, the American teacher workforce is overwhelmingly white. In 34 states, the demographic gap between minority students and their white teachers is more than 20 percentage points, and some studies suggest this gap is growing. The gap is particularly pronounced in urban centers like New York. The Big Apple has an 85 percent racial/ethnic minority public school population, but only 40 percent of its teachers are non-white – a 45 percentage-point differential.

The study suggests that a core reason teachers of color may find favor with students is because they have experienced the feeling of being a non-dominant member of society and thus understand their challenges better.

“When I look at my children I see myself ... I also know that being smart has nothing to do with skin color,” Valentine, an African American female teacher who has taught in both urban and suburban schools, interviewed for the study said.

Previous research suggests that when students feel a greater sense of connection to their teachers it can boost academic performance. This connection is partly attributed to the expectations their teachers have of them.

Referencing that data, the study put it bluntly: “Teachers have higher expectations of White and Asian American students and lower expectations of Latino and Black students.”

It also explored whether so-called race matching of students and teachers affected grades. Results were mixed with some saying it can boost grades and others saying it did not make a measurable difference.

However, it found black students were particularly fond of their black teachers, Latino students were ambivalent, and Asian-American students also gave high ratings to their black teachers.

"For white teachers, I strongly believe that if we study more what's going on with minority teachers and how they develop relationships with all of their students ... we can train all teachers to do this," Professor Cherng told the Daily News.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.