Should colleges provide ‘safe spaces’?

Some protest groups on campuses have aggressively demanded safe spaces. But some are a bit worried about the idea’s proliferation.

Mark Schierbecker/AP/File
This Nov. 9, 2015, frame grab shows Melissa Click, right, an assistant professor in the University of Missouri's communications, during a run-in with student journalists during protests on the Columbia campus. She was also videotaped calling for "some muscle" to remove a student videographer during the protests. Ms. Click was fired from the university in February.

The notion of a campus “safe space,” which has seen much ink and ridicule, is nothing new, says Louie Dean Valencia-García.

The teaching fellow at Fordham University in New York has studied student protest movements from those in Franco’s fascist Spain to “Occupy Wall Street.” The term “safe spaces” was first used by gay men facing ridicule and violence in the 1960s, as well as by young feminists being derided in classrooms.

“It was a response to hate, and trying to find a place that was safer than those they were experiencing on campuses,” Mr. Valencia-García says.

The idea has been revived by minority students at dozens of colleges.

After protests at Claremont McKenna College in California last fall, after which some administrators resigned, the president responded to student demands, promising a resource center organized around diversity and inclusion.

Students in other colleges in the Claremont system advertised campus meetings via Facebook “only for people of color and allies that they invite. Please feel free to come and use the space for whatever you need – decompress, discuss, grieve, plan, support each other, etc. In solidarity.”

Mark Naison, professor of African and African-American studies at Fordham for more than 45 years, is a bit worried about the idea’s proliferation. “The university is a place where there’s debate, discussion, disagreement, fierce controversy, and that is more important than students feeling safe,” he says, echoing many conservative critics. 

While Professor Naison says students absolutely should be safe from intimidation, insult, and being singled out, he says it wasn’t easy for him as a working-class kid from Brooklyn attending an Ivy League school.

“I had to struggle, so toughen up,” Naison says, recalling his own days at Columbia University in the 1960s. “A lot of my peers, black and white, feel the same way toward this, I will tell you. If you want to be in a safe place, don’t go to a university.”

Next: On campus, a new civil rights era rises

Clarification: This article has been updated at the request of Claremont McKenna College, to clarify that they did not characterize their diversity and inclusion resource center as a "safe space."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.