Will Illinois school district forgo funding over transgender teen in locker room?

Illinois's largest high school district risks losing $6 million in federal non-discrimination funding by insisting that the student change behind curtains in the girls' locker room, citing other students' discomfort. 

The state of Illinois's second largest high school district has one month to decide which it values more: a transgender student's wish to be treated as a 'normal person,' or other students' and adults' concerns over privacy.

The student at the center of the case, who was born male but has identified as female for many years, is receiving hormone therapy, The New York Times reports, and her suburban Illinois high school has honored her wish to go by a female name and pronouns, in keeping with district policy. She also uses women's restrooms.

When it comes to changing rooms, however, the Palatine Township High School District 211 insists that she change behind a privacy curtain, which the American Civil Liberties Union claims is discrimination, saying the student, who has not been named, could not "participate equally." 

On Monday, the US Department of Education announced that the district had one month to comply, or risk losing millions in Title IX funding.

She has "experienced an ongoing sense of isolation and ostracism throughout her high school enrollment at the school," the department's Office for Civil Rights wrote in a letter to the district superintendent.

But the district insists that privacy curtains are the best solution to honor all students' needs, and denies breaking any law. 

"We condemn any vitriolic messages that disparage transgender identity or transgender students in any way," Superintendent Daniel Cates said in a statement. However, he called the decision "serious overreach" and said that other students' privacy, and perhaps immaturity, made privacy curtains the best option. 

"Students in our schools are teenagers, not adults, and one's gender is not the same as one's anatomy," Dr. Cates wrote. On previous occasions, some students and at least one parent objected to the student changing with her other female teammates.

According to the girl's lawyers, she will most likely continue to use curtains, but wants to do so voluntarily, not under orders from the district.

"It's one thing to say to all the girls, 'You can choose if you want some extra privacy,' but it's another thing to say, 'You, and you alone, must use them.' That sends a pretty strong signal to her that she's not accepted and the district does not see her as girl," ACLU lawyer John Knight told the Chicago Tribune. 

Although the school seems poised to fight the Department of Education's decision, which could possibly lead to the case being referred to the Department of Justice, the order made the plaintiff "extremely happy," according to an ACLU statement: "The district's policy stigmatized me, often making me feel like I was not a 'normal person.' "

The Department of Education has intervened in two similar cases in California, where both districts agreed to let transgender students use the facilities of their choice.

This report includes material from Reuters and The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.