Why are US teachers so white?

Fewer than 50 percent of children at public schools are white, but over 80 percent of teachers are. A new report examines why those numbers pose a challenge to student learning.

Patrick Semansky/ AP
A Baltimore student walks past vacant buildings as school gets out for the day. A new report says that poor working conditions in under-resourced schools are to blame, in part, for the low number of minorities working as teachers.

The Shanker Institute on Wednesday released an in-depth report on teacher diversity, or the lack thereof, in the US.

Over 25 years, from 1987 to 2012, minority teachers have actually grown as a percentage of the teaching workforce, from 12 to 17 percent. However, that modest change is nowhere near keeping pace with student demographics, now that over half of public school students are children of color, leaving the institute to conclude that “More than 60 years after the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was handed down, its promise remains un-fulfilled.”

According to Shanker’s research team, the problem does not lie in training or recruitment, at least not when it comes to the number of minority applicants and hires. Instead, teacher turnover may be to blame.

Nationwide, teacher attrition remains an enormous problem, costing schools $2.2 billion per year. Just over half of all new teachers are still in the classroom five years later, NPR reports. Although the financial cost of that “revolving door” is formidable, the real price is paid in student learning, which suffers from losing more experienced teachers year after year.

Teachers leave the profession for dozens of reasons, but one common one is the challenging working conditions in the country’s most under-resourced schools, which tend to have a high percentage of both minority students and minority teachers; a 2014 study from the National Education Association found that teachers in low-performing schools were 50 percent more likely to leave the classroom. 

According to the Shanker Institute, that’s why the steady number of minority novices dwindles so quickly. Among their top complains are “a lack of collective voice in educational decisions and a lack of professional autonomy in the classroom.”

The underrepresentation doesn’t just bother education experts for numbers’ sake, but because of its toxic effects on children’s learning, from test scores to social stereotypes. Teachers are some of children’s most powerful role models, but young men of color, in particular, rarely see someone who looks like them in front of the classroom. A diverse teaching force helps dispel stereotypes in children’s minds, the institute says, and minority teachers’ own experiences or cultural knowledge can sometimes help them respond to students’ needs.

The Shanker report also notes that teachers of color tend to have higher expectations for their minority students than white teachers would, one of several factors contributing to students’ improved success when taught by someone from their own racial or ethnic group.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans became a virtual laboratory for educational reform, including questions about the influence of minority teachers. As the floods receded, the long-struggling school district fired nearly all of its workforce, 71 percent of which was black.

As charters took over the city’s schools, New Orleans was flooded again, this time with young, white teachers, few of whom hailed from Louisiana. Today, with the workforce roughly half black and half white, teaching a 90 percent black population, debates rage on about what combination of experience, community knowledge, tradition, and innovation will best serve NOLA’s kids. 

But underrepresentation haunts most major US school districts, from New Orleans to New York. To strengthen minority teachers' retention, the Shanker Institute calls for the Department of Education to focus on historically black, tribal, or diverse colleges, and to make sure future teachers’ preparation is relevant to high-needs schools: helping them make an impact for not just for a year or two, but a career.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why are US teachers so white?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today