Judge blocks Gov. Bobby Jindal's signature school voucher program

The nation's boldest school voucher program made nearly half of Louisiana's students eligible for taxpayer-funded vouchers to attend private schools. A state judge ruled the plan unconstitutional, setting up a funding fight in an age of austerity.

Michael Conroy/AP
Phillip Covington helps his son Giovanni with a math lesson at Todd Academy in Indianapolis. Struggling Indiana public school districts have launched a marketing campaign to persuade parents not to move their children to private schools as the nation's largest voucher program doubles in size.

In a major blow to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal's school reform efforts, a state judge on Friday found that Gov. Jindal's signature state school voucher program, which makes nearly half the state's students eligible to attend private schools, is unconstitutional.

Louisiana's program, pushed through in April by Jindal, allows families of four making no more than $57,000 a year to receive vouchers for private schools. Its goal is to impose competition on public schools while allowing poorer parents to move their children out of failing schools. About 450,000 Louisiana pupils are eligible.

Teachers unions have blasted the program, complaining that some of the private schools receiving the money focus on so-called Young Earth Creationism over evolution. A judge hearing a separate voucher lawsuit in New Orleans last week agreed with another complaint: That the voucher program threatens to undermine federal desegregation orders that are in effect in 30 school districts around the Pelican State.

RECOMMENDED: Six takeaways on the achievement gap

While Jindal will appeal Judge Tim Kelley's ruling to the Louisiana Supreme Court, the ruling's main importance is how it's likely to create more debate about how to fund state voucher plans, which currently are in place in 12 states, about half designed for children with certain disabilities.

Teachers unions brought the lawsuit in Louisiana, while 12 families have brought a lawsuit currently being mulled by the Indiana Supreme Court over similar issues: whether state law mandates that taxpayer money go exclusively to public, or common, schools.

Friday's ruling is a big disappointment for Jindal, who's widely seen as a rising star in the Republican Party’s stable of nationally competitive candidates, potentially for president. The voucher plan embodies several tenets of national educational philosophy being touted by Republicans, particularly the goal, as with charter schools, of breaking teacher unions’ hold on failing schools by empowering parents.

The "ruling is wrong-headed and a travesty for parents across Louisiana who want nothing more than for their children to have an equal opportunity at receiving a great education,” Jindal said.

But the gambit has also been ensnared by criticisms over the curriculum of parochial private schools. In some of those schools, instruction is focused on creationism over evolution. At the same time, the US Supreme Court has affirmed the right of religious institutions to receive taxpayer funds through vouchers, as long as the state itself isn't advocating a particular faith.

In an at-times emotional trial, state lawyers argued that as long as Louisiana funded public schools at adequate and equitable levels the state could divert some education funds to parochial and other private schools to boost parental school choice.

While he didn't strike down that philosophy more broadly, Judge Kelley took issue with how the program dovetailed into the state's complex school funding formula, called the Minimum Foundation Program, which Kelley ultimately interpreted as being intended solely for public schools.

The approximately 5,000 students already enrolled in the program will be able to continue for the time being, even as the state education officials scramble to find alternative funding sources. One option is for the state to use its general fund to pay for the program, as it already has, most notably, to fund a city voucher program in New Orleans.

That, however, is likely to be a tough sell in a state already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall, and where lawmakers already have had to make steep cuts in its charitable public hospital system that benefits the poor and uninsured.

RECOMMENDED: Six takeaways on the achievement gap

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge blocks Gov. Bobby Jindal's signature school voucher program
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today