Two more states granted waivers from No Child Left Behind, for total of 26

Washington State and Wisconsin were approved Friday for No Child Left Behind waivers. The Obama administration has argued that children can’t wait for Congress to revise the federal law.

J.B. Forbes/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/AP/File
In this June 25 file photo, during a fact-finding tour of Vashon High School, US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan (c.) listens to eighth-grade students Delvion Mitchell and Makayla Lewis, as they discuss social issues they have encountered at school and what they have learned from them, in St. Louis.

With the approval Friday of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) waivers for Washington State and Wisconsin, more than half the states are now moving forward with their own accountability plans for schools.

President Obama directed the US Department of Education last year to start the waiver process to give states flexibility from some parts of the federal law, which has been due for a rewrite since 2007.

In exchange, states have to show detailed plans for preparing all students for college and careers, targeting federal aid to the students most in need, and pushing for better evaluation and support of teachers and principals.

Twenty-six states have now had waiver plans approved. Another 10 states, plus the District of Columbia, have waiver applications pending.

“It is a remarkable milestone that ... more than half of the states in the country have adopted state-developed, next-generation education reforms,” said US Education Secretary Arne Duncan in a statement Friday. “A strong, bipartisan reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [the formal name of NCLB] remains the best path forward in education reform, but as 26 states have now demonstrated, our kids can’t wait any longer for Congress to act.”

But with waiver applications running hundreds of pages long, there could be unintended consequences down the road, just as there have been with NCLB, says Maria Ferguson, executive director of the Center on Education Policy in Washington. “You always worry about robbing Peter and paying Paul,” she says, “and right now it’s just a big question mark." She adds, "Some states are going to be pretty well prepared to see their plans through, others not so much.”

It will take years to phase in all the elements of Wisconsin’s waiver plan, notes Wisconsin superintendent Tony Evers. The “ambitious education reform package,” he said in a statement, “is based on college- and career-ready expectations, increased academic rigor, and a multiple-measures approach to assessment and accountability for students and schools.”

Some highlights of the Wisconsin plan:

  • Students will now need to earn more credits in math and science. One requirement for the waiver was to raise academic standards to get students on track for college or 21st-century careers, many of which require better math and science backgrounds. To provide a more well-rounded experience, education officials are advocating a state requirement to boost elective credit requirements in subjects such as art, music, and world languages.
  • New assessments based on the Common Core State Standards that many states, including Wisconsin, are adopting will be implemented fully in 2014-15. Proficiency standards will be benchmarked nationally and internationally. One complaint about NCLB was that many states set their proficiency standards too low in order for their scores to look good.
  • For a subgroup to be tracked in a school’s accountability rating, the minimum number of students needed in a subgroup – such as students with disabilities or of a particular minority race – will be lowered from 40 to 20. This way fewer students will be “invisible” in the system.
  • A comprehensive score will place schools into one of five categories, ranging from “fails to meet expectations” to “significantly exceeds expectations.” This replaces NCLB’s “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) measure, which was based on reading and math proficiency targets that went up every year and aimed toward a goal of 100 percent proficiency by 2014.
  • The lowest-performing 5 percent of schools, and the 10 percent of schools with the largest subgroup achievement gaps, will have four years to show strong improvements through plans approved by the state. Another option for the worst schools is closure. NCLB required a series of interventions for all schools that did not meet AYP goals.
  • The state will recognize and reward high-performing schools and highlight some of their best practices. This was a condition for states to receive the waiver, because the Obama administration was concerned that NCLB focused too heavily on underperformers and appeared to be punitive.

Washington State’s plan, which has many similar elements, will free up the state to use more flexibly the $34 million that NCLB had required to be spent on outside providers for services such as tutoring.

Some congressional Republicans have criticized the Obama administration and Secretary Duncan for overstepping their authority in granting such waivers. Their answer to Mr. Obama’s mantra of “we can’t wait” has been to introduce several education reform bills – to make charter schools more widely available, give states and school districts more flexibility in how they spend federal dollars, and boost teacher effectiveness.

In addition to Wisconsin and Washington, the states that have been approved for waivers from NCLB are: Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia.

Sept. 6 is the deadline for states that want to apply for the next round of waivers.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Two more states granted waivers from No Child Left Behind, for total of 26
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today