Who could be the next Ted Cruz? Top 10 tea party primaries of 2014.

Who are the tea party movement's top candidates in 2014, and what are their prospects? Here's a look:

9. Idaho: Bryan Smith vs. Mike Simpson

Kim Raff/AP/File
Idaho Republican candidate Bryan Smith (r.) talks with Lynn Lewis (l.) and Dale Thornock at a town hall meeting during a campaign stop in Montpelier, Idaho, last November. He was knocked out of contention for a House seat in the May 20 primary.

Update: Rep. Mike Simpson beat trial lawyer Bryan Smith easily, 62 percent to 38 percent, in the May 20 primary for the Second Congressional District.

Here's the background: Few incumbent House members faced nationally backed tea party challengers, but this race was one. And Representative Simpson isn’t just a congressman – he’s a close ally of House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio. And he scored only 47 percent in the conservative Club for Growth’s 2013 scorecard.

The Club and the other big Washington-based tea party organizations – FreedomWorks and the House branch of the Senate Conservatives Fund – backed Mr. Smith. The US Chamber of Commerce backed Simpson, including an ad that featured an endorsement by 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

Fundraising offered a glimpse into the race: Smith raised $137,000 in the first quarter of 2014, about a third of what Simpson raised.

9 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.