What's in a word? US newsrooms move to capitalize 'Black.'

Spurred by racial justice protests around the nation, some newsrooms have moved to capitalize "Black" as a note of respect in the description of a person's race and culture.

Steve Schaefer/Atlanta Journal-Constitution/AP
A crowd of protesters in Atlanta walked as part of The NAACP March to the Capitol on June 15, 2020. Nationwide protests against racial inequality have sparked a conversation in U.S. newsrooms about the capitalization of the word "Black" when describing people.

As journalists grapple with massive protests and sweeping changes in the aftermath of George Floyd's death, newsrooms around the United States are debating an important style change: whether to capitalize the "b" in Black when describing people.

The Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and NBC News last week changed their practices to do that, and the National Association of Black Journalists urged other news organizations to follow.

The Christian Science Monitor also recently made that change. In the Monday, June 15, 2020 issue of the Daily the Monitor's editor Mark Sappenfield shared with readers the reason for the change:

The power of recent weeks has been the demand to listen humbly – the Monitor included. So after considering the decision from different perspectives, the Monitor is now capitalizing Black. The goal is not to value one race over another, but the opposite. In better cherishing the Black experience in America, we recognize its unique role and seek firmer footing for genuine equality and freedom.

Many are studying the idea, including The New York Times and The Associated Press. The AP Stylebook of usage policies is highly influential in the industry with many news organizations, government, and public relations agencies using it as a guide.

The death of Mr. Floyd, a Black man who died after a white Minneapolis police officer pressed a knee to his neck, has sparked nationwide protests and has given momentum to an idea that has essentially been dormant for a number of years.

"It does seem like now is the time," said Doris Truong, director of training and diversity at the Poynter Institute, a journalism think tank. "It's a change, as the NABJ points out, that doesn't cost you anything and ... is very meaningful to the people who are affected."

It's also a relatively simple step for news organizations suddenly dealing with many complex issues, like whether its journalists can be opinionated on social media or march in Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

Nearly a century ago, sociologist W.E.B. DuBois waged a letter-writing campaign to get newspapers to capitalize Negro, saying a lowercase "n" was a sign of disrespect and racism. The New York Times took his advice in 1930, calling it an act of recognition and respect for those who'd spent generations in "the lower case."

Negro fell out of fashion with the Black Power movement of the 1960s, coming to symbolize subservience. African American was often used, but is not always accurate – some black people don't trace their lineage to Africa.

The USA Today Network said Friday it would adopt uppercase style for Black immediately, a move that affects more than 260 newsrooms including its flagship USA Today newspaper.

"Capitalizing Black reflects an understanding and respect that is consistent with how many Black people and Black publications describe the people and descendants of the African diaspora and reflects a rich range of shared cultures," the company's diversity committee said in recommending the change.

The Seattle Times and Boston Globe both changed their practices to capitalize Black late last year. The Globe explained that the word has evolved from a description of a person's skin color to signify a race and culture, and deserves the uppercase treatment, much like Latinos get.

The biggest complicating factor for news organizations is whether descriptions of white or brown people should also be capitalized.

A description of a person as "white" generally doesn't carry cultural connotations. There's also some concern that a capitalized "white" has associations in some minds with white nationalist or supremacist movements, said Paula Froke, the AP's stylebook editor.

With the issue taking on a new urgency since Mr. Floyd's killing, the AP is actively considering it, she said.

"We look at it from an objective point of view of how language has evolved," Ms. Froke said.

In a nod to the AP Stylebook's influence, a half dozen news organizations have reached out in the past week to see what the AP was doing.

The Black journalists' association has capitalized the word in its own communications for the past year, but had received several inquiries recently about why the AP doesn't, said NABJ President Dorothy Tucker. The group wanted to make its preferences known, she said.

Another seemingly small step by the AP last year – removing a hyphen that separated African American – had outsized influence because it removed a stigma of "otherness," Ms. Truong noted.

Journalists should also be thinking about a host of other issues, among them increasing diversity on their staffs and in voices included in stories, and imagery like the use of mug shots, said Sarah Glover, manager of social strategy for NBC-owned television stations.

The capitalization of "Black" is "an important conversation," Ms. Glover said. "But this is not something that should be a one-hit wonder."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What's in a word? US newsrooms move to capitalize 'Black.'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today