Senate confirms Seema Verma to head Medicaid, Medicare

Businesswoman Seema Verma has said that Medicaid, the health care program for 74 million low-income Americans, fosters dependency among the poor.

Evan Vucci/File/AP
Seema Verma, left, then President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, gets on an elevator in the lobby of Trump Tower in New York in January.

The Senate has confirmed President Trump's pick to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Seema Verma.

Ms. Verma, who worked with then-Indiana Gov. Mike Pence to design a Medicaid expansion there, was confirmed by a 55-43 vote, mostly along party lines. Part of the Department of Health and Human Services, the $1 trillion agency she will head oversees health insurance programs for more than 130 million people.

Verma will have her work cut out for her as Republicans push forward with their plans to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. As head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Verma will play a major role in implementing the Republican's proposed replacement, the American Health Care Act.

Verma, a first-generation American whose parents immigrated from India, is the owner and founder of SVC Inc., a healthcare consulting firm that has helped redesign Medicaid in several states. In her position as president of SVC, Verma has been highly critical of Medicaid, saying that she wants the government to improve health rather than simply focusing on paying bills.

"The status quo is not acceptable," said Verma, referring to the program.

At her hearing, Verma faced scrutiny from Senate members for her Medicaid redesign in Indiana, which uses financial rewards and penalties to encourage patients away from emergency rooms and towards primary-care providers. Critics have said that the plan, as modified by SVC, is confusing and has led many people to accidentally incur unnecessary penalties. But Verma defended the reward/penalty program during her Senate hearing, saying that low-income people are perfectly capable of making health care decisions based on the rational incentives created by her team.

In an initial committee hearing, Sen. Ron Wyden (D) of Oregon said Verma's firm was being paid by companies providing services to Indiana's health program even while she was working to redesign the Medicaid in that state. Verma denied the allegation, and promised to divest her financial interests in the firm within 90 days of her confirmation.

The American Health Care Act, which will be one of Verma’s top concerns as head of Medicare and Medicaid, has come under fire from many Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress. According to a study released on Monday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the CBO found the new healthcare plan would cause 14 million Americans to lose health insurance within a year, and 24 million more would be uninsured by 2026.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price told reporters on Monday that the Trump administration strongly disagreed with these findings, saying that the CBO had not examined the new policy thoroughly enough.

Verma will report to Mr. Price in her new position, but her views on Medicare and Medicaid slightly differ for her new boss's. In the past, Price has embraced turning government-guaranteed Medicare into a voucher plan with a fixed government contribution for each beneficiary. Supporters of the plan say the strategy would increase competition and drive down premiums, but critics say the plan would leave some seniors with higher premiums as others turn to private insurance.

While the picks of Price and Verma fill two key positions in the Health and Human Services department, many senior officials in HHS have yet to be confirmed or appointed.

This article contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.