Boston’s St. Patrick Day’s parade planners face backlash over gay vets ban

Gay vets thought their 20-year fight for the right to march was over, until this year's parade organizers voted to reverse their decision. 

Steven Senne/AP/File
Members of OutVets, a group of gay military veterans, march in the annual St. Patrick's Day Parade in Boston's South Boston neighborhood on March 20, 2016. The group said Wednesday, March 8, 2017, it was denied permission to march in the 2017 Boston St. Patrick's Day parade just two years after organizers made the ground-breaking decision to allow gay groups to participate for the first time.

Two years after marching for the first time, whether gay veterans can participate in this year’s Saint Patrick’s Day Parade is once again an open question. 

The South Boston Allied War Veterans Council voted 9 to 4 on Tuesday to ban the OutVets group from marching, prompting immediate criticism from Boston’s mayor, and other high-ranking politicians. The council has scheduled an emergency meeting to reconsider the decision on Friday, just two days before the famous celebration of Irish-Catholic heritage.

The reason for the reversal remains unclear. According to OutVets founder Bryan Bishop, officials say the group broke parade rules prohibiting symbols of gay sexuality when they carried a rainbow banner. But he insists they’ve made every effort to conform to the parade’s code of conduct.

”If we did break any rules, we were never informed," Mr. Bishop told the Associated Press. He claims the flag issue has been resolved.

The vote prompted swift political backlash, starting with Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, who intends to resume the 20-year parade boycott Boston mayors have carried out ever since the Supreme Court upheld the Allied War Veterans Council’s right to ban LGBT from participating in 1995.

"I will not tolerate discrimination in our city of any form," he said in a statement.

Mayor Walsh was joined by Republican Gov. Charlie Baker and US Rep. Seth Moulton, as well as the 2017 parade chief marshal, Dan Magoon, the executive director of Mass Fallen Heroes, who resigned over the vote. 

"The freedom that we possess to hold such an event as the St. Patrick's parade is due to the men and women who have spilled their blood in defense to this great nation, regardless of their race, religion, gender or sexual orientation," he wrote in a letter to the council.

Bishop said his suspicions that the council might reverse their decision reach back to November, when Brian Mahoney, the former head of the veterans’ council and OutVets ally, died.

"The only thing I can assume is that with Brian no longer there to beat the drum for us they had enough support to put us out," Bishop told the AP.

Sponsors area also objecting to the ban: the Anheuser-Busch brewing company says it's reconsidering its participation and the local grocery store chain Stop & Shop says it will pull out if the ban remains.

The parade, which draws as many as 1 million spectators to South Boston each year, first welcomed OutVets and Boston Pride to march in 2015, ending Mayor Walsh’s boycott.

“I’m thrilled that the St. Patrick’s Day parade is inclusive this year, and the addition of Boston Pride to the list of participants reflects the values of the South Boston neighborhood,” he said in a statement at the time. “With this year’s parade, Boston is putting years of controversy behind us.”

Some Catholic groups had long opposed the change, saying that it contradicts the Catholic culture celebrated by the parade. While almost all groups with a religious affiliation marched as planned that year, two withdrew in protest.

“We deeply regret that some have decided to use this occasion to further the narrow objectives of certain special interests, which has subjected this occasion to undeserved division and controversy,” wrote the Massachusetts chapter of the Knights of Columbus at the time, condemning the politicization of the parade.  

“Call it the Evacuation Day Parade. Call it the South Boston Irish Pride Festival,” Catholic Action League Executive Director C.J. Doyle wrote on the group's website. “Call it whatever you want, but don't debase the name of Saint Patrick by associating it with the tawdry circus that will take place on Broadway [Street] tomorrow,” said The Catholic Action League.

Such resistance highlights the growing opinion gap even within the Catholic community, where a 2014 Pew Research Center poll showed 85 percent of self-identifying Catholics under 30 said society should accept homosexuals, as opposed to 57 percent of those 65 and older.

Against a cultural background of growing inclusion, the decision to suddenly exclude the groups from the 2017 parade came as a shock to many.

Ed Flynn, a member of the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council and Navy veteran who voted in favor of OutVet said he was "saddened and outraged" that the council "voted to turn back the clock on equality."

Until the council takes another look at that clock on Friday, many worry about the image the decision projects.

"This is a black eye on South Boston," said Bishop.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.