Trump says he'll keep LGBT protections for federal workers

The White House issued a statement Monday that President Trump has no plans to reverse Barack Obama's federal workplace protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender people.

Angela Major/The Janesville Gazette/AP/File
Jamie Killips of Madison waves an LGBT pride flag during the Women's March near State Street in Madison, Wis.

After a week of signing executive orders that contrast with the actions of his predecessor, President Trump said he plans to leave federal workplace protections that shield the LGBT community from discrimination in place.

The White House announcement comes just hours before Mr. Trump is expected to nominate a US Supreme Court justice to fill the nearly yearlong vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death. Many have speculated that Trump would seek a conservative justice much like Mr. Scalia to fill the empty seat on the nine justice bench, leaving LGBT activists and supporters to worry what influence the new justice could have on decisions involving discrimination and marriage equality.

Trump has made it clear that he plans to dismantle much of former President Barack Obama’s work, after having criticized him for years. In a week where some religious and racial minority groups have felt ostracized by the new administration, the announcement was seen as a win for the LGBT community.

"President Trump continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights, just as he was throughout the election," the White House announced in a Monday statement. "The president is proud to have been the first ever GOP nominee to mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech, pledging then to protect the community from violence and oppression."

The executive order, signed into effect in 2014, barred federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees and made it illegal to factor gender identity into decisions regarding federal employment.

A year later, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of gay marriage, striking down laws in states that still prohibited same-sex couples from marrying.

Still, some state legislatures have passed laws that seek to limit the scope of the decision or allow continued, and sometimes more subtle, forms of discrimination.

The next Supreme Court nominee, if confirmed by the Senate, could have the opportunity to hear challenges to such laws as they continue to crop up around the country. Should Trump select a nominee whose values resemble those of Scalia, it’s likely the justice could vote in favor of keeping the laws on the books.

While he was governor of Indiana, Vice President Mike Pence signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which allowed business to deny services to LGBT people on the basis that doing so violated their religious beliefs. Citing past anti-LGBT rhetoric on the part of Mr. Pence, many activists have worried that the Trump administration could pose threats to the community’s rights.

Over the weekend, a draft of an executive order seeking to overturn the protections began circulating. It reportedly included provisions that would allow agencies and groups which receive federal funds to deny LGBT applicants on the basis of religious beliefs – a tactic similar to the RFRA.

The Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT civil rights advocacy group that opposes the Trump administration, said it remains skeptical of the president’s commitment to the gay community.

“Claiming ally status for not overturning the progress of your predecessor is a rather low bar. LGBTQ refugees, immigrants, Muslims and women are scared today, and with good reason. Donald Trump has done nothing but undermine equality since he set foot in the White House,” Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin said in a statement to The Washington Post. “Donald Trump has left the key question unanswered — will he commit to opposing any executive actions that allow government employees, taxpayer-funded organizations or even companies to discriminate?”

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.