Trump challenges GM on cars made in Mexico

Trump tweeted that the carmaker must either build its cars in the US or 'pay a big border tax.'

Bobby Yip/Reuters/File
A Cruze car is shown at a Chevrolet event in Guangzhou, China in November 2016.

Threatening once again to impose a hefty tariff on foreign-made goods, US President-elect Donald Trump singled out yet another manufacturing company Tuesday via Twitter, criticizing General Motors Co. for making some of its compact cars in Mexico.

Since winning the presidential election in November, Mr. Trump has made a habit of targeting big businesses one by one, including United Technologies Inc., Boeing Co., and Lockheed Martin Corp., to name a few. A spokesman for his transition team said these individual critiques reflect a broader goal for the incoming Republican administration to rescue American workers.

"In this case, the tweet was specific to General Motors," spokesman Sean Spicer told Reuters. "But I think you've seen an overall philosophy during the campaign and since he was elected to stand up for American workers and make sure that American companies don't benefit from moving their companies overseas and leaving American workers behind."

Although not specific, Trump's Tuesday threat was clear: "General Motors is sending Mexican made model of Chevy Cruze to U.S. car dealers-tax free across border," he wrote. "Make in U.S.A. or pay big border tax!"

General Motors responded with a statement acknowledging that "a small number" of Cruze hatchbacks are manufactured in Mexico and sold in the United States. The overwhelming majority of Cruze models sold to Americans, however, are sedans – all of which are made in Lordstown, Ohio, the company said.

Of the 190,000 Cruze models sold in the US last year, only 4,500 – less than 2.4 percent – were hatchbacks made in Mexico, a GM spokesperson tells The Christian Science Monitor in an email. Although sales were down significantly last year, the Cruze is one of GM's best-selling cars.

Trump – who has denounced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) among Mexico, the US, and Canada, which took effect in 1994 – did not specify how he would impose the tariff threatened in his tweet or how severe it would be. But the comment echoes past statements in which he has threatened to impose a 35 percent tax on foreign-made goods sold to Americans by companies that offshore American jobs, an idea economists have said would not work.

"Imposing tariffs or putting up trade barriers may sound good, but it will hurt our economy and credibility," Wendy Cutler, a former acting deputy US Trade Representative who helped negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership last year, told Reuters in March. And others point out that presidents lack the authority to impose tariffs unilaterally without congressional approval, as CBS Money Watch reported.

Hours after Trump's tweet about GM, rival carmaker Ford Motor Co. announced it would cancel plans to built a $1.6-billion factory in Mexico, instead investing $700 million at a factory in Michigan. Shortly before noon, Trump retweeted a link to a Fox News article praising him as "quite the job creator" for putting pressure on Ford and others to keep jobs stateside.

GM chief executive Mary Barra is among business leaders who sit on a council unveiled last month to advise Trump on job creation efforts.

Detroit's "Big Three" automakers – GM, Ford, and Chrysler – have all sought in recent years to produce more small cars in Mexico for the North American market in an effort to lower labor costs, while having American workers build trucks, sport utility vehicles, and luxury cars, which are more profitable.

In 2014, GM announced a $5-billion investment in its Mexican plants, creating 5,600 jobs. In November, GM announced plans to lay off nearly 2,000 employees at two US auto plants in early 2017, including at the facility in Lordstown.

GM will halt the third shift at the Lordstown plant on Jan. 23, cutting 1,250 jobs.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to