Why SNL's 'the bubble' sketch about news polarization is all too true

The Brooklyn-like city encased in a bubble mirrors the real-life 'news bubble' many Americans have attested to finding themselves in.

Leave it to “Saturday Night Live” to hold up a mirror to the “news bubble.”

“What if there was a place where the unthinkable didn’t happen, and life could continue for progressive Americans just as before?” cast member Kyle Mooney asks in the skit that aired Saturday.

“The Bubble is a community of like-minded thinkers – and no one else,” adds Shasheer Zamata.

Though the city encased in a plastic bubble is fictional, it offers real-life criticism of the echo-chamber that left-leaning Americans are concerned they have been enclosed in. In part driven by the mainstream media’s incorrect election predictions and alarms over fake news and unreliable information spread on Facebook and Google, Americans on both sides of the political spectrum have started to question how they receive their news and the circles with which they surround themselves. But many have also started to seek out news from a more diverse variety of sources. 

In satirizing this bubble, SNL is further calling attention to it. In the parody ad, cast members Mr. Mooney and Ms. Zamata describe a Brooklyn-like city surrounded in an actual bubble. Those living there can connect to the outside world through websites such as The Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Netflix documentaries about sushi rice, they say.

“We’ll be fine right here in the Bubble,” says Mooney. “It’s their America now,” says Zamata.

In the two weeks following the election of Donald Trump, SNL has subtly critiqued how many left-leaning urban dwellers were stunned by the results. Last week, black comedians Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock shrewdly warned a room of their white liberal friends on Election Night that Mr. Trump could come out on top.

The skit starts with Cecily Strong’s character saying, “we're about to have our first woman president, like, this is going to be a historic night.”

"It might be a historic night, but don't forget it's a big country," says Mr. Chappelle.  

As the Christian Science Monitor’s Harry Bruinius reported, “a number of Americans, particularly those on the left still bewildered by the election of Mr. Trump, have begun to question the mainstream coverage that seemed to confidently assume that Hillary Clinton would emerge as the 45th president.”

“At the same time, too,” continues Mr. Bruinius, “the proliferation of unreliable information has approached what many consider to be near-crisis proportions. In addition to the frustration many have felt with the mainstream press, there is growing concern social media, designed to entice engagement rather than offer factual information, has spawned the viral spread of deliberately misleading and fake news.”

A fake news article, “FBI Agent Suspected In Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide,” received more than 8.7 million shares, reactions, or comments on Facebook, according to analysis from BuzzFeed News. Of the top 20 most-shared fake news stories, 17 spread information that favored Trump or excoriated Clinton.

On Monday, Facebook and Google said they would take action to combat such misinformation. Google said it would ban websites that trafficked fakes news from using its online advertising services. Facebook said it would also stop displaying ads from fake news sites.

But the problem appears to be as much psychological as it is the spread of false reports. As Vox recently reported, when we as humans are part of a group, we like to see that group in a positive light. This could then lead to an occurrence psychologists call  “confirmation bias,” in which we seek out facts and news sources that support ideas we already believe to be true.

“Our number one bias is to make ourselves feel good. It just feels bad to be wrong, to lose. So we avoid it at the cost of reckoning with the truth,” writes Vox's Julia Belluz and Brian Resnick. 

But some Americans have taken steps to expand how they gather information. Americans interviewed by the Monitor have testified to buying subscriptions to news sources considered more center-right such as The Wall Street Journal or planning to follow Fox News in addition to The New York Times.  

In fact, the New York Times reported an increase of 41,000 subscribers since the Nov. 8 election, its largest one-week total since it developed its paywall model in 2011. The Atlantic and The Wall Street Journal are among other publications that have also reported surges in readership and subscribers since the election.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why SNL's 'the bubble' sketch about news polarization is all too true
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today