Who is Jason Kander, and why is his concession speech drawing attention?

Republican Roy Blunt held on to his Missouri Senate seat as the GOP swept the state. In his concession, Democratic challenger Jason Kander urged his supporters to 'stay invested' in the political process.

Orlin Wagner/AP
Democrat Jason Kander concedes to Sen. Roy Blunt (R) of Missouri during an election watch party at the Uptown Theater in Kansas City, Mo. on Wednesday.

Politics doesn’t just happen once every four years, Jason Kander reminded his supporters early Wednesday.

In an impassioned concession speech, the Democratic challenger for Sen. Roy Blunt’s seat called for the Millennial generation to stay involved in politics, even when the results aren’t what they had hoped for. Millennial voters had turned out in droves to campaign for Mr. Kander, Missouri's secretary of State, making the race surprisingly tight.

Driven by the high stakes of the election, a record-setting share of Americans went to the polls on Tuesday, some sources have reported. As America looks beyond the campaign, Kander’s words may underline that this engagement with the political process can continue beyond the campaign, for voters on both sides of the aisle.

“This country is a place that you’ve got to stay invested in. You don’t get to decide that you are going to be okay with the politics, that you’re going to believe in the politics of this country [only] when it goes your way,” Kander told his supporters in an early-morning concession speech on Wednesday.

Political disengagement is a persistent concern between elections, with midterm elections consistently recording much lower voter turnout than presidential contests. More broadly speaking, many analysts – looking at low turnout and limited engagement with political parties and other institutions – have suggested that citizens are withdrawing from the political process, particularly considering the divisiveness of this campaign.

But political polarization often lends itself to more consistent engagement in politics, studies show. 

The race between Senator Blunt, a one-term incumbent, and Kander, an Army veteran who had served in Afghanistan before becoming Missouri’s secretary of State in 2013, was one of the closest nationwide. It was also one of the most expensive, costing the two candidates a combined $61 million, of which $35 million came from outside groups.

Both parties considered the seat pivotal to determining control of the Senate during the next Congress. And Kander, a Washington outsider who appealed to the Millennial generation, was widely seen as a strong challenger to Blunt, whose wife and three children are political lobbyists.

Polls showed Blunt with a slight edge as the election drew closer, and the coattails of Donald Trump’s 20-point margin in Missouri may have helped the incumbent senator secure victory. Mr. Trump appears to have boosted many down-ballot Republicans in the state, who swept the positions that were up for re-election.

Despite his defeat, Kander emphasized to his supporters that "checking out" of the political process was not an option. He himself has vowed not to give in to that temptation, though it’s unclear what his next step will be. Missouri’s other Senate seat, which comes up for re-election in 2018, is held by fellow Democrat Claire McCaskill.

"This is a generation that is capable of greatness … and it has a lot of work to do," he said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Who is Jason Kander, and why is his concession speech drawing attention?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today