Trump hats in uniform? San Antonio police will be disciplined

San Antonio police officers who wore 'Make America Great Again' hats while in uniform will be 'appropriately disciplined' for violating department policy, the city's police chief announced Tuesday. 

Carlo Allegri/Reuters/File
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" hats are photographed during a meeting with Trump's Hispanic Advisory Council at Trump Tower in New York City on August 20, 2016.

More than a dozen officers who donned red "Make America Great Again" hats while in uniform will be "disciplined appropriately," the San Antonio police chief announced Tuesday night. 

In a statement posted to Twitter, police chief William McManus wrote that members of the department’s motorcycle unit who were assigned to help escort the Trump motorcade and ended up appearing in a campaign video for the Republican nominee had "violated SAPD policy." The officers are seen in the 25-second video wearing Trump's signature red caps, some giving the candidate the thumbs-up as he thanks them.

"The officers displayed poor judgment," wrote Chief McManus. "I expect them to know better than to give the appearance of endorsing a candidate while on duty and in uniform, regardless of the political campaign or the candidate." 

Questions surrounding the role of police in campaigns have received increased attention in the past year, due to several high-profile incidents involving officers in uniform appearing to endorse political candidates. Some argue that officers should be allowed to express their freedom of speech; others say the practice violates policy and sets the wrong tone for a democracy. 

This isn't the first time uniformed police officers have appeared in a promotional video for Donald Trump. Last month, the city of Phoenix, Ariz., sent the Republican nominee's campaign a cease-and-desist letter over a television ad that showed Trump speaking with on-duty Phoenix officers. But unlike the officers in San Antonio, the Phoenix police said they were not intentionally showing support for Trump, did not realize that they had been photographed, and had not given permission for their images to appear in the ad. 

In his letter to the Trump campaign, City Attorney Brad Holm argued that the video violated federal and state law by using copyrighted material without permission, writing, "In this context, the ad unmistakably and wrongfully suggests that Phoenix and the officers support or endorse Mr. Trump's campaign." 

The San Antonio police, caught on video wearing campaign gear, were in violation of a different type of city policy that prohibits officers from participating in political activity while acting in their capacity as city employees, the San Antonio Express-News reports. 

A number of cities and states have similar policies, to varying degrees. Pittsburgh Police Chief Cameron McLay came under fire this summer for speaking at the Democratic National Convention while in uniform, leading to complaints that the uniformed appearance was in violation of the municipal code.

The debate over whether he had truly violated policy spurred several investigations on the matter, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports: Chief McLay insisted that his speech was not campaigning – yet, accusers pointed out, professional campaign speech writers had edited his remarks. Last month, in response to the incident, Pittsburgh's mayor asked the city's public safety director to consider creating clearer regulations on such matters. 

A similar debate has ensued in New Hampshire in recent weeks, after Senate hopefuls Sen. Kelly Ayotte and Gov. Maggie Hassan each featured law enforcement in advertisements. New Hampshire's Department of State Police does have a policy prohibiting members from appearing in uniform "for testimonial or commercial purposes," according to the New Hampshire Union Leader.

But Sen. Ayotte claimed that the appearance was protected by the First Amendment rights of the officers. And Brian Buonamano, senior assistant attorney general, told the Union Leader that the state's Department of Justice had not offered guidance on the matter of officers appearing in endorsements. 

"I can say that police officers do not sacrifice their right to freedom of speech by becoming a police officer," Mr. Buonamano said.

Opponents of uniformed officers appearing in political ads or at campaign events argue that their presence sets a dangerous tone for a democracy. 

"Having uniformed officers endorse a politician at a campaign event can either give the candidate an aura of support from the government itself or make people afraid to oppose the police choice, which is inappropriate in elective politics," Newsday wrote in an editorial published last year. 

Some reactions to the San Antonio officers wearing Trump hats voiced similar concerns. 

"So, I guess @SATXPolice officially only protects and serves SOME people," one Twitter user wrote. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Trump hats in uniform? San Antonio police will be disciplined
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today