Is it Columbus Day or Indigenous Peoples' Day? City by city choices

Some cities, like Phoenix, Ariz., will celebrate native Americans on Oct. 10. This week, Bostonians rallied for a similar change. But the shift is not universally popular.

Elaine Thompson/AP/File
Ferntree, of Duncan, BC, a member of the Cowichan Tribes, holds her hand up as a prayer is given during a Native American protest against Columbus Day in Seattle in 2011. In 2014, Seattle joined the growing number of cities that have renamed the holiday to Indigenous Peoples' Day.

Are you celebrating Columbus Day on Monday?

Inhabitants of US cities from Santa Cruz, Calif., to Belfast, Maine, will instead observe Indigenous Peoples’ Day next week. On Wednesday, as Phoenix, Ariz., became the largest city to make the switch, Bostonians rallied outside City Hall to press for a similar change. Advocates say that the name change recognizes the consequences of Columbus’s arrival – the process of European settlement that caused the deaths of countless indigenous peoples and the loss of their lands. But some say that renaming Columbus Day obscures the discrimination once experienced by Italian Americans, whom the holiday was originally instituted to honor.

"The movement is really to get the record straight – celebrate indigenous people that currently exist today in the U.S. and Boston and across the world, [and] just to recognize the true record of what happened," Danielle DeLuca, program manager at Cultural Survival, which helped implement the name change in nearby Cambridge, Mass., told the Boston rally on Wednesday.

That focus on history was echoed in Cleveland, where Councilwoman Yvette Simpson proposed renaming Columbus Day to Indigenous Peoples’ Day.

"This perspective is not meant to be divisive. In fact, it’s meant to be inclusive, not to rewrite history but to tell the full story," she said before the vote. The measure failed to get a majority, with 4 yes votes and 5 abstentions.

But opponents say the name change may be perpetuating discrimination against another population: Italian Americans. At a 2014 news conference, Seattle activist Ralph Fascitelli, who was coordinating a movement to change the name back to Columbus Day, announced, “We say today, ‘Basta!’ We say, ‘Enough.’ We say, ‘No more discrimination.’ Not now and not here.” 

Columbus Day, which celebrates the arrival of Italian explorer Christopher Columbus in the American continent, was first given national recognition by President Benjamin Harrison following the 1892 lynching of 11 Sicilian immigrants in New Orleans. Intended to counter anti-Italian immigrant attitudes, the day became a federal holiday in 1934.

One Cleveland City Council member, Charlie Winburn, suggested that replacing a holiday presented a greater challenge than establishing a new one. States and cities can establish their own holidays, and Columbus Day was celebrated in more than 20 states before gaining federal recognition.

But activists may feel that renaming an existing federal holiday is a better route to recognition than attempting to establish a new holiday nationwide. There are just 10 federal holidays held every year.

In much of Latin America, Columbus Day – referred to as Day of the Race (El Día de La Raza) and similar names – celebrates indigenous traditions and cultural heritage. Indigenous people, who account for around 13 percent of Latin America’s population, often face poverty and discrimination, and the day is seen as a time to recognize those struggles. The quincentennial of Columbus Day in 1992 provided the impetus for forming a fund to support indigenous development in the region. Colonial powers Spain and Portugal are founding members.

"A lot of people view a name change as just a symbolic gesture," said Tufts sophomore Parker Breza to the Daily Free Press, "but they forget that when history is continually erased, correcting those false narratives and bringing up these counter-narratives is really important."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.