Isaiah Washington calls for Black Lives Matter strike on Monday. Too rushed?

The former 'Grey's Anatomy' actor has called upon African Americans to stay home from work on Monday to protest police violence, but some critics say that a rushed effort would undermine the cause.

Frank Micelotta/Invision/AP/File
Isaiah Washington participates in a panel for the CW show, 'The 100' in Pasadena, Calif., in 2014.

What would happen if, for one day, every African American stayed home from work? 

Actor Isaiah Washington aims to make that hypothetical a reality, as he has urged African Americans across the country to boycott their jobs on Monday in an organized protest against police violence. The effort, announced in a Facebook post last week, follows the publicized shootings of two black men by law enforcement in recent weeks. 

"Imagine if every single African American in the United States that was really fed up with being angry, sad and disgusted, would pick ONE DAY to simply 'stay at home' from every single job, work site, sports arena and government office in the United States of America," Mr. Washington, known for appearing on the television show "Grey's Anatomy," wrote in a Facebook post Tuesday, six days before the proposed strike. "I'm very sure that within 72 hours from Wall Street to the NFL ... Black Lives Would Matter." 

It would certainly not be the first time a strike or boycott has been held for social justice causes. But critics of Washington's proposal say such protests need more time and effort to plan in order to be truly effective. 

"Re: Isaiah Washington & other calls for boycotts: We disrespect the cause by not understanding just how much work & strategy goes into them," wrote journalist Vann R. Newkirk II in a Twitter status on Monday. 

Perhaps the most famous strike in modern American history, the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955 and 1956, lasted upwards of a year and ended with the Supreme Court ruling that segregation on public buses is unconstitutional. But the planning of that protest began months before it was set in motion by the arrest of Rosa Parks in December 1955, with more than 25 local organizations coming together earlier that year to organize a city-wide bus boycott. 

More recently, in 2006, more than a million demonstrators skipped work and school and took to the streets to protest proposals to toughen immigration laws on what organizers called "The Great American Boycott," or "A Day Without Immigrants." Similarly to the Montgomery Bus Boycott, this protest was organized by a coalition of immigrant advocacy organizations, Catholic groups, and labor unions. 

Washington is not the only one to propose such a strike in response to recent police shootings and racial tension. A nationwide protest known as the Injustice Boycott is set to launch on Dec. 5, the same day that the Montgomery Bus Boycott began. More than 63,000 people had registered as of Monday morning, according to the boycott's website. 

"Many rushed efforts have failed in the past," the event's organizers wrote in a Facebook post Saturday. "Our goal is to be creative and methodical in our efforts." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.