Lead found in Tacoma pipes: Has Flint spurred new vigilance?

National attention on the drinking water quality in Flint, Mich., has prompted several cities in Washington State to evaluate its pipes, too.

Flint, Mich., isn't the only city that has lead in its pipes. But the water crisis there could spur new vigilance about the issue in other cities that are affected.

Water officials with the city of Tacoma, Wash., said on Wednesday that tests have found high levels of lead at water lines leading to four homes. In all, about 1,700 customers may be affected. The problem stems from sections of lead pipe called goosenecks, which connect the water main to water meters outside homes. Those pipes are found more frequently in older homes that were built in the early 20th century.

Tacoma's lead pipe issue prompted officials in Seattle and the city of Everett, Wash., to look into their own water supplies, although they are not connected to the one in Tacoma. The city and utility has advised residents in Seattle and Everett to run their water for two minutes before using it as a precaution. Lead and other metals can easily sneak into standing water.

But while cities around the country say that they've worked to clean up their water systems, the crisis in Flint, and now Tacoma's advisory, highlights that it's an ongoing problem. Troublingly, problems in the pipes tend to concentrate in poor, urban areas.

"For the most part, the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has declared victory on lead," Robert Bullard, an environmental sociologist and dean of the Barbara Jordan-Mickey Leland School of Public Affairs at Texas Southern University in Houston, told The Monitor in January. "But there's a residual that still remains, and most of that residual is in urban, inner-city areas. And the children that are most disproportionately impacted still tend to be poor children, children in the inner city, [and] a high percentage of children of color."

Criminal charges were ultimately filed against officials in Michigan for how they handled Flint's water supply. The national attention that Flint's water crisis has garnered may prompt other cities to investigate their own water more closely, as Tacoma, Seattle, and Everett did.

Material from The Associated Press was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.