Tribune: Alleged abuse victim of ex-Speaker Hastert could testify

A federal prosecutor said Tuesday that an alleged victim was considering appearing as a witness at the sentencing of the former U.S. House Speaker, who has been convicted of trying to hide hush-money payments to another victim.

AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast, File
In this June 9, 2015 file photo, former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert arrives at the federal courthouse in Chicago for his arraignment on federal charges in his hush-money case. A filing in Hastert's hush-money case confirms prosecutors intend to call at least one witness at the former U.S. House speaker's sentencing, though the order posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2016, by the presiding judge doesn't identify that witness. Hastert pleaded guilty to violating bank laws in seeking to pay $3.5 million in hush money to some referred to in the indictment only as "Individual A." Prosecutors have spoken before about giving victims closure but never identified any.

An alleged sex abuse victim of former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert could testify at his sentencing on a conviction for trying to hide hush money he was paying to another alleged victim, the Chicago Tribune reported on Wednesday.

Hastert, 74, pleaded guilty in October to a federal charge of "structuring" - evading bank reporting rules by withdrawing large amounts of cash in smaller increments. The former Republican speaker of the House of Representatives used the funds to pay an individual to keep quiet about decades-old allegations of sexual misconduct.

Hastert's sentencing has been postponed due to his recovery from a serious illness, and could possibly be held in May.

At a brief hearing on Tuesday, a federal prosecutor told Judge Thomas Durkin that a man identified as "Individual D" was considering appearing as a witness at the sentencing, according to a transcript published on Wednesday in the Tribune.

Reuters was not immediately able to obtain a copy of the transcript.

"If Individual D wants to come in and talk about being a victim of sexual abuse, he's entitled to do so because that informs my decision about the history and characteristics of the defendant. It's that simple," Durkin said in the transcript.

Prosecutor Steven Block said the alleged victim has been hesitant about coming forward.

"His decision to talk to us has been quite a process and a difficult one at that," Block said.

Block also told Durkin that the sister of another alleged victim could also testify at sentencing. Block did not name the woman, but he said it was someone who has spoken with national media. Jolene Burdge has spoken on national television to say that her brother, who died in 1995, was sexually abused by Hastert.

Hastert's defense lawyers argued that the judge could take written testimony from Individual D, and also said that if he came to the sentencing he would be cross-examined.

Durkin said there would be limits to the cross-examination.

Hastert has not been charged with abuse. The victim who he was paying hush money has only been identified as Individual A, and allegedly knew Hastert during the time when he was a high school teacher and wrestling coach in his hometown of Yorkville, Illinois, in the 1960s and 1970s. It is not clear whether Individual D also knew Hastert during that time frame.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.